User talk:Mlaurenti

Wikiproject New Jersey

I see that you've gotten off to a good start in somne New Jersey-related edits. I invite you to join WikiProject New Jersey, which is aimed at filling in the wholes and expanding details regarding the state of New Jersey. Alansohn 17:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NJ Collaboration of the Week

Thanks for participating in Wikiproject New Jersey. In an attempt to create articles for some of the non-existing pages related to New Jersey, NJCOTW was recently created to bring members of WP:NJ together to work collaboratively on a certain selected topic, which this week is List of Governors of New Jersey. Please help by nominating/voting/commenting on articles on WP:NJCOTW, or by helping to improve articles in the scope of the topic for the NJCOTW. AndyZ 00:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mlaurenti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 00:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:P6140018.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:P6140018.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

GSP exit list reverts

Thank you Mlaurenti for starting the exit list on Garden State Parkway. It was a wonderful starting point and contribution. However, it does need some work (such as the US/CR abbreviations that Alansohn fixed, as well as minor factual errors). I understand your attachment to your work, but please do not revert edits that serve to make the encyclopedia better. Thanks. -- Northenglish 21:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a productive edit to the exit list. However, I'm curious as to why you decided to change "Township" back to "Twp" in some, but not all, cases. Alansohn edited the exit list to make it more consistent, and those changes will likely be reverted again. -- Northenglish 00:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Turnpike

Please be more attentive - my version now includes the piece to the GWB. --SPUI (T - C) 13:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Route 32 (New Jersey)

The purpose of the infobox is to give a brief overview of the route. Since it ends at the Turnpike overpass, it does technically end at the Turnpike, and including the Turnpike in both the junction list and the eastern terminus is extremely redundant. Tidbits of information such as that it actually ends at the overpass, not the interchange, should be included in the article text, not the infobox. -- NORTH ^talk 21:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The word exit

Why did you capitalize exit in this edit? --SPUI (T - C) 13:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox_road template standards

I have added a discussion thread at WT:NJSCR to address standards for NJ road infoboxes and invite your participation. Over the past several weeks, we have made tremendous progress in cleaning up the articles for the State highways in New Jersey, especially with the expansion and addition of infoboxes to most of these articles. However, there seems to be a great deal of confusion as to what should be going in these infoboxes. I am creating this thread and inviting those users who have been active participants in editing these pages to come up with a mutually agreeable answer on the issues listed. I will take on the task of moderating this discussion, but I will add my 2 cents on these topics. We can add more questions if needed, but please, be civil. Alansohn 23:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know you don't need me, I quit, I don't want to help.

A follow up on the usage of "Toll Gate" and toll plaza

It seems we've decided to use "toll gate" to refer to the toll facilities located at exits rather than on the Parkway itself; however, as a frequent user of the Parkway I would like to note that each and every toll facility on the Parkway identifies itself as a "TOLL PLAZA." In the windows of the booths, there are green signs reading, e.g.:

UNION
TOLL PLAZA

at a mainline plaza or, e.g.

UNION RAMP
TOLL PLAZA

at an exit. Regardless of what the common term for such a facility is, the term on the Parkway is toll plaza. In fact, other than in the New Jersey state driver's manual, which refers to them as "Toll Barriers," I've rarely heard them called anything but plazas on any road in the NY-NJ-CT region. I would change all the "gate"s to "plaza"s myself but I (a) don't feel up to the task at the moment and (b) I'd rather not start a revert war over the Garden State Parkway.--Mjj237 04:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. The edit you made regarding the tolls is well-worded; thanks for catching it. This page is susceptible to revert wars for whatever reason, but I will go ahead and make the edits to read "Toll Plaza". -- NORTH ^talk 05:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to a foolish statement once made by a foolish New Hampshire governor, there are no "toll gates" on the Garden State Parkway (or anywhere in New Jersey, AFAIK). The Merritt Parkway used to have actual toll gates: gates at the toll barriers that did not raise until the proper toll was paid. But this has never been the case in NJ and "Toll Plaza" is definitely the correct term.

Atlant 20:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clearing that up, Atlant, now it all makes sense. Although, a few of the older toll booths for exact change only have/had gates on them. (I moved out of New Jersey 5 years ago, so I don't know what the current status is.) -- NORTH ^talk 21:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At Exit 145, the I-280 Exit, there used to be tollgates. I don't think they are there anymore. The baskets don't always work perfectly and there would be tieups and problems.--Wehwalt 16:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re I-95

The junctions aren't; per WP:IH only ones ending in 0 or 5 can go in the routeboxes on articles ending in 0 or 5. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cranbury_per_wiki_copy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cranbury_per_wiki_copy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:E._brunswick.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:E._brunswick.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Image:Exit 8A (aerial NJDOT) copy.jpg and Image:New 8a.jpg say in the corner "(C) NJDEP", and the other maps obviously come from the same source. You cannot upload them (or modified versions) to Wikipedia without NJDEP releasing them under a sufficiently free license. --NE2 14:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; you need to get permission, not only to use on Wikipedia, but to use under a free license. Most governments are not willing to do this; you may be able to generate something free using GIS data like the US Census TIGER/Line data. --NE2 18:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signs

The Interstate shields are public domain, but the logos of the toll roads are being used under fair use. --NE2 17:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights

Stop uploading copyrighted images and then falsely claiming that they are in the public domain. If an image has a copyright notice on it, then it is not appropriate for use in Wikipedia. Wikipedia's policy on copyright violations includes the following warning: In extreme cases of contributors continuing to post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings, such users may be blocked from editing to protect the project. If you wish to continue to contribute here, you must stop uploading copyrighted images. | Mr. Darcy talk 18:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since images created by NJ Gov't are copyrighted, then they CANNOT be uploaded to Wikipedia (even with permission from NJ Gov't). If you can show somewhere public where the government of New Jersey has released these works into the public domain, then they can be uploaded to Wikipedia. If you call someone in the state government who says that you can use the images, that is not sufficient for Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any other questions. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting statement. Leaving aside the question of why the State of New Jersey copyrights material, I wonder what this means with relation to the NJ Open Public Records Act? Essentially, most material outside the judicial branch of government in NJ that does not have an explicit reason to be confidential, is public. And of course, material has copyright protection even without an explicit copyright notice. Where does this leave us with respect to any state government records? Bill Michaelson 13:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phillipsburg-Newark Expressway vs. Interstate 78

As an aspiring road geek, I have heard the term "Phillipsburg-Newark Expressway", but most people think of it as Interstate 78. Does it make sense to refer to it as "Phillipsburg-Newark Expressway (Interstate 78)" or shouldn't it be "Interstate 78 (Phillipsburg-Newark Expressway)" to reflect the more common name? Alansohn 22:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CR 520 / Shore Points

Greetings again. You may remember a few months ago that when you added the Shore Points note to Exit 8A on the exit list on New Jersey Turnpike, I reverted it off because I was thinking of a different route. When you explained what you were thinking (612 to 520), I allowed it to stay. But the problem with this is that it's all original research. Let me explain...

When you made this edit, I looked it up on Google Maps, and a number of other trip planning sites. The shortest route from the Exit 8A ramp to Sea Bright (the end of 520) is not 520 all the way -- you take 18 to 36. Therefore, all these edits you've made saying that CR 520 serves as the connector from the Turnpike to Shore Points is incorrect. It's barely even a direct route, with a number of turns near downtown Red Bank and Rumson.

So then let's go all the way back to the Turnpike edit that sort of started all this. In order for someone to use Exit 8A for "Shore Points" -- whether they take 520 all the way or not, they would have had to get on the Turnpike at either Exit 9 (or further north) or Exit 8 (or further south). But if you do a search for New Brunswick (Exit 9) to Sea Bright, it has you taking the Turnpike to Exit 10 to the Parkway south to Exit 109. If you do a search for Hightstown (Exit 8) to Sea Bright, it has you taking NJ 33 to CR 537 to NJ 18 to NJ 36]. The simple fact is that Exit 8A is not used to access Shore Points, and that CR 520 is not a "connector" between the Turnpike in Jamesburg and the Parkway in Middletown. -- NORTH ^talk 23:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

Moved from my talk page archive:

A question... I would like to upload an image for Route 92, created by the Army Corps. According to their website ([1]), it says that information is "considered public information and may be distributed or copied." Is this adequate enough to upload to Wiki? Mlaurenti 0:38, 5 Febuary 2007.

Yes, that means that they are placing the images in the public domain, so you're in the clear. Thanks for checking. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Now, since I am still not familar with licensing, I would like to know the following... 1. If I would like to edit an image (add municipal townlines), is that possible? 2. If yes, how would that image be licensed? Many thanks again! Mlaurenti 0:46, 5 February 2007.

Please add any questions for me to my talk page - you've been adding these to an archive page instead. THe answer to the first question is yes, unless their copyright release statement prohibits it. I would tag it as released by the author into the public domain, and then add a note to the image's talk page identifying the source image and explaining what you did to alter it. That should keep you in the clear and avoid any trouble from users who come along later and are confused about the image's sourcing. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

There's a discussion going on at WT:USRD#Photo galleries? that may affect the photographs you've uploaded to Wikipedia. Please feel free to share your opinion. -- NORTH ^talk 19:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Monroe Twp Tower 2005.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Monroe Twp Tower 2005.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:P7150390.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P7150390.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved a couple of your other images of the bridge to commons. Have you considered uploading your images to commons instead of here? They can still be linked to articles in an identical manner, but can then be used by any of the various language wikipedias. ~ Bigr Tex 00:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:P7040203.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:P7040203.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I have an idea...

You wanna collaborate on the Interstate 287 article?Mitch32^contribs 16:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just by curiousity, what part of Jersey you live in? If you do at all? Because I live in Middlesex County.Mitch32^contribs 17:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also live in Middlesex County. I'm curious as to where you (Mlaurenti, not Mitch) got information about the Milltown area development going around in Monroe Township or whatever it was. (I'm more familiar with: Jamesburg, Helmetta, Spotswood, the Brunswicks, Rossmoor and Concordia, and some parts of northern Monroe Township.) — Rickyrab | Talk 12:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I admit to not being familiar with the name "Millstone Preserve", although I could probably tell you where the "Hills of Matchaponix" are (somewhere near Texas Road, I think), and could recall that there was a "stone museum" within a short drive from there (I'll have to go find it, but I was there as a kid and there were signs pointing to it.) I also know that there are at least two synagogues in Monroe Township (one's in the Concordia shopping center and another one is called the "Monroe Township Jewish Center - Congregation Etz Chaim"), and I think Rossmoor may have a congregation and Chabad-Lubavich might have an outlet somewhere. I could also tell you that Mill Lake School is not the original school by that name. (It was torn down and replaced by a school next to its original site, not too far from what was the old school's playground.) But I know next to nothing about the Millstone Preserve. — Rickyrab | Talk 02:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I've seen Trenton. A lot of parking lots. On the plus side, you can take a brief walk to Pennsylvania from the statehouse :) — Rickyrab | Talk 02:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okeydokes — Rickyrab | Talk 02:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, I'll go and look — Rickyrab | Talk 20:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see it in there. — Rickyrab | Talk 00:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NJSCR Newsletter 6

I am sending you a copy of the WP:NJSCR newsletter (its 6th edition). You are the featured member, so you can get a free copy.

The New Jersey State and County Route Newsletter
Issue 6 – October 1, 2007

Issue #6

The 6th edition of the WP:NJSCR newsletter. This one will hopefully start a monthly streak of newsletters.

Project News

Many articles are starting to reach Start and B-class.

New Jersey Route 55, New Jersey Route 47, New Jersey Route 74 all got upgraded to B-class. County Route 622 (Middlesex County, New Jersey) failed its 3rd Good Article nomination due to unreliable sources and other conditions. We currently now have over 10 B-class articles.

New Jersey Route 75 has reached Start-class.

A to-do list has been posted on the project page, with a more detailed version at WT:NJSCR#To-do list. The simple version:
- Ensure that all freeway exit lists are up to exit list guide standards.
- Make sure all infoboxes have the new maint= parameter.
- Make sure the straight line diagram is properly referenced in the infobox.
- Add a major intersections table to each article.

Member of the Month: Mlaurenti

The member of the month for this edition is User:Mlaurenti. He joined in March of 2006 and has been a worker ever since. Works include starting the Garden State Parkway's exit list. Thanks for all your hard work, Mlaurenti!

Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here.Mitch32^contribs 01:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey advisory

The WikiProject New Jersey Reboot

Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.

You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.

You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.

Notice delivery by xenobot 01:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)

The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter

Volume I - Issue 1	26 August 2008

Project News

Article Alerts

The Reboot of Wikiproject New Jersey has certainly stirred up some new activity at the project. Discussion on several improvements and new initiatives have been going on at the talk page. There has been an involved discussion regarding our 119 unassessed articles, especially those on municipalities. The current goal is to review and assess all 566 New Jersey muncipality articles by September 30.
A suggestion has been made to intiate Wikipedia Takes New Jersey to begin clearing the large backlog of articles needing photos. Let's all grab our cameras and head out into the vast wilds of the Garden State. Town Halls, High Schools, Historic Places - every article deserves a picture.

The following articles may be in need of attention:

Featured Article candidates:

none at this time

Good Article nominees:

New Jersey Collaboration news

New WPNJ members

WPNJ member Mm40 has volunteered to coordinate a new WPNJ Collaboration project. It's been a while since we used the NJCOTW and new volunteers are needed. Join the discussion to volunteer.

Battle of Trenton was recently proposed as a Featured Article candidate. It was not promoted, but has now been nominated for A-Class review through the Military History WikiProject. Take a look at their A-Class FAQ. As we need to set up our own process for reviewing A-Class articles, it may be worth watching the process.

Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:

User:WTGDMan1986 joined on August 20

Reboot progress report

Help Wanted

The redesign has been well received. There are still some things left to do. This newsletter was one big check mark off the list. Hopefully this can be continued on a regular basis. There are literally thousands of articles in Category:New Jersey that have not been tagged as part of the project, and stub sorting hasn't been run in 10 months. We will need to identify some friendly bot operators to help with these projects. An outreach department (which includes the newsletter) needs to be formalized. Creating an invitation template for easy placement on userpages will also be part of that effort.

There are lots of best practices described at the WikiProject Council with ideas of how to make our project more responsive, welcoming, active, and effective. Task forces? Peer review? Other ideas welcome!

New member recruiters
Style guideline writers
Newletter writers
A-class article reviewers
Portal crew members
Many more
Ask a question, make an offer

Editor's Notes

I just wanted to say that the response to my bold makeover of WPNJ has been gratifying, but nothing will improve the project as much as more activity, and that means more members. There are lots of things to do in this new setup, and everyone with an interest should be able to find a way to contribute to the collaboration. I want to thank you all for the patience, the appreciation, and the effort. - Jim Miller

You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 18:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)

The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter

Volume 1 - Issue 2	26 September 2008

Project News

Article Alerts

The Maryland WikiProject has put together a great chart comparing the growth of several state WikiProjects, including WPNJ. Take a look at the chart to see how the growth of WPNJ compares to some of our peer projects. Please remember to place the {{WikiProject New Jersey}} tag on the talk pages of any New Jersey related articles you create or come across. You can also add the new articles page to your watchlist.
Some updates have been made to the NJ Portal, but much more needs to be done. If a few volunteers can put together Featured Article summmaries, we can automate rotating the portal content. The same can be done for DYK items. Please take a look and see if you can assist.

The following articles may be in need of attention:

Featured Article candidates:

None at this time

Good Article nominees:

None at this time

Wikipedia Release version 0.7

New WPNJ members

The Wikipedia 0.7 project team has chosen the New Jersey related articles that will be included in the next downloadable version of Wikipedia. You can review the list of selected WPNJ articles, check the articles tagged for cleanup, or nominate additional articles for inclusion.

Selection is an automated process based on article assessments. To help avoid vandalism and POV concerns, specific versions of articles can be tagged for inclusion in the downloadable release. See the New Jersey section of the bot results to recommend a production version. The process ends on October 20, and then a bot will select an appropriate version if none has been recommended.

Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:

Shirulashem (talk) 4 September 2008
Spartacusprime (talk) 8 September 2008

Article News

Help Wanted

Both Jon Corzine and The Sopranos were promoted to Good Article status in the past month. No WikiProject New Jersey articles were promoted to Featured article status. Battle of Trenton was not listed as a Featured Article, and may need more editors to complete the remaining work to be promoted. Also, in an item that was missed last month, Thomas Edison was delisted as a Good Article in July.

The WPNJ Assessment Drive is ongoing. Please help assess all of the articles about places in New Jersey. There are currently 119 articles that have not been assessed.

Editor's Notes

Fall has arrived, and with it will come a rush of new Wikipedians. Inviting new editors to join WPNJ is easy to do, and can help us improve our New Jersey articles. Keep an eye out for editors who work on NJ articles who can help the project. The Wikipedia Release version project is in its final stages for the next version. Take a look at the article lists, cleanup where you can, and nominate articles that should be included on the DVD version of WP. Lets make sure that those who end up with a downloaded copy of WP get solid articles about New Jersey. - Jim Miller

You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)

The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter

Volume I - Issue 3	29 October 2008

Project News

Article Alerts

A new bot is patrolling Wikipedia workflows to let WPNJ members know when any of our articles may be in need of attention. Any article tagged with the WPNJ banner that has been added to one of the major workflows (AfD, FAC, GAN, etc.) will be added to a new project page. The bot runs daily, so add the new Article Alerts page to your watchlist, or just check the main project page to see the updates. See the Article Alerts project page for details on how the bot works and which processes it covers.

The following articles may be in need of attention:

Featured Article/List candidates:

List of Nobel Laureates affiliated with Princeton University

Good Article nominees:

none at this time

Cross-Project Collaboration Request

New WPNJ members

WPNJ received the following request for assistance with New Jersey Devils articles:
"The WikiProject Ice Hockey is currently looking for editors to help update team articles about the 2008-09 NHL season. If you are interested in the NHL, please consider helping us keep these article current. To sign up, go to this page and add your name beside the team or teams you wish to particpate in."
See the WPNJ talk page for more information.

Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:

Rhvanwinkle (talk) 9 October 2008

New Jersey on the Main Page

Help Wanted

No, not the state - the battleship! On October 15, USS New Jersey (BB-62) was the Featured Article on the Wikipedia main page. Featured articles receive heavier traffic when they are on the main page. Improving WPNJ articles to featured status can help drive more editors to our project.

Recruit new members
Article Assessments
Ask a question, make an offer

Editor's Notes

Seems like a pretty light month in terms of activity at WPNJ. Personally, your editor was doing a lot of travelling and went on a wiki-free vacation for nine days. Time to dive back in and create some new NJ articles. - Jim Miller ^{See me | Touch me}

You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no see

I see you're still editing partially :) - been a long time since i've seen your editing :) - Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 12:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. I and another user have gotten a ton of state highway system expanded, so we're doing well :) - Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 15:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. And much to my annoyance, NJ 32 is still a cruddy article. There's a bunch of routes in Jersey to go still. See User talk:Dough4872 near the bottom to see the list.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 15:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A rewrite.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 16:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History needs a strong rewrite. Good job on the RD though.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 14:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WikiProject New Jersey

Hi, Mlaurenti, User:Nightscream and I had a disagreement over certain parts of NJ municipality articles; because the discussion could potentially affect hundreds of articles, we decided to bring the discussion to WikiProject New Jersey. I would value your input in the discussion, which you can find here. Thanks, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I-80 in NJ

For future reference on other articles you may edit, I changed your edit which bolded the Interstate 80 link in the lead paragraph of Interstate 80 in New Jersey. It should be bold but not linked, per the WP:MOS which discourages bolded links. The USRD project has addressed this issue by developing the {{Highway detail hatnote}}, which is explained at WP:USRD/STDS#Lead. Thanks for contributing and please contact me with any questions. Sswonk (talk) 13:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)

The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter

Volume II - Issue 1	12 November 2009

Project News

Article Alerts

Education Task Force - The conversion of the former WikiProject Education is New Jersey has been completed. New Jersey education-related articles are now supported by the Education task force. The project banner has been updated to fully support the task force with independent importance ratings.

No More Comments - A proposal at the Village Pump has resulted in the deprecation of comments subpages. These were usually found at Talk:Article title/Comments and contained little more than assessment notes. These pages were not widely watched, and are often a hidden location for vandalism and BLP violations. WPNJ has 104 articles that used these pages. A complete list of them, along with their contents, can be viewed at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Jersey/Deprecation of comments. It is up to the members of WPNJ to decide what to do with this information.

The following articles may be in need of attention:

Featured Article candidates:

none currently

Good Article nominees:

Municipality template compromise; School Districts (almost) complete

New WPNJ members

Legislative templates in municipal articles - A rather lengthy discussion ran from the end of August until the end of October regarding the use of our legislative district templates in articles about local municipalities. Many WPNJ members commented on the concept, and a proposed compromise seems to have been reached. The templates will require some adjustments to fit the new wording, but should result in more directly relevant sections about County, State, and Federal representation in our articles on cities, towns, villages, townships, and boroughs. Hopefully, more dicussions like this can result is some kind of Manual of Style to bring greater standardization to all of these articles.

School District articles now comprehensive - WPNJ Founder Alansohn recently reported that almost all of New Jersey's school districts now have articles - "I have created the article for the last missing (non-vocational) school district in the state." Congrats to Alansohn, who I am sure would love more members at the Education task force to help maintain these articles!

Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:

A Stop at Willoughby 10 November 2008
Andrewmin 17 November 2008
cryptod 10 January 2009
marksdaly 15 March 2009
Aki Mononoke 23 May 2009
N2icv 14 June 2009
mannybrown1 24 June 2009
Madr1000 14 July 2009
Mr. Matté 15 July 2009
Christopher 17 August 2009
Rttam 11 October 2009

Watch These Pages

Help Wanted

Want to do more to help WikiProject New Jersey? Here are some suggested pages to add to your watchlist:

Newsletter writers and editor
Photographers
Ask a question, make an offer

Editor's Notes

Editor's news. OK, so I am going to try this again. It's been a little over a year since our last edition, and activity at the project was a bit slow during that time. Things have picked up again over the last few months, so once more into the breech I go. I will try to produce this newsletter on a regular basis (bi-monthly?) to see if we can get some more activity going at WPNJ. Help is always appreciated, and there is plenty to do. - Jim Miller ^{See me | Touch me}

You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 14:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)

The WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter

Volume II - Issue 2	25 January 2010

Project News

Article Alerts

New Statistics Table There has been an upgrade to the WP 1.0 bot that updates our project's summary table. The new table lists all page classes including Portal-class, Redirect-class, and Disambig-class. We now have a better picture of the scope of the WikiProject and the pages that we cover.
New York Times to charge for access The New York Times is an invaluable resource for properly referencing articles, but especially due to its extensive archives and coverage of New Jersey issues. The announcement that metered content will be started in 2011 has the potential to make article sourcing much more difficult. It also causes a need to update linked sources in articles before all of the NYT links go dead. Any link can be archived on demand by using WebCite. We can help avoid dead links by archiving any article sources from the NYT.

The following articles may be in need of attention:

Featured Article/List candidates:

List of Governors of New Jersey (FLC)

Good Article nominees:

U.S. Route 30 in New Jersey

All BLP, All the Time

New WPNJ members

BLP Issue Boils Over There are discussions all over the 'pedia about deleting close to 50,000 unreferenced Biographies of Living People. We won't get into a rehash here, but let's just look at what we can do. There is a new item on the project task list for sourcing BLPs. All articles that are in both Category:People from New Jersey and Category:All unreferenced BLPs are now available on this work list. These articles need to be sourced, PRODded, or sent to AfD.

An ounce of prevention Unreferenced BLPs are one of the catgories regularly listed in the WPNJ Cleanup listing. New articles are also a prime location to find articles that do not yet have references. You can keep an eye on the New Articles list to help prevent the workload from getting any larger. Can we do more? There are bots that will automatically add the WPNJ Project Banner to all articles in our designated categories if we have consensus to request it. Join the discussion here.

Please welcome the following new members to WikiProject New Jersey:

No new WPNJ members since the last issue!

In NJ, politics means article updates

Help Wanted

New Leaders in NJ Government Over the past 2 weeks, new legislators have been sworn in, the legislature has new leadership, the 55th Governor of New Jersey has been inaugurated, and we have our first Lt. Governor. All new members of the Legislature have at least stub articles, and many of the templates have been updated.

Updating templates Many New Jersey articles utilize stadardized templates to convey information. With elections happening as often as they do in this state, January is always a good time to review these templates and update them with new information. Does your town or county have new elected officials? It's maintainance time on many of our articles on municipalities and counties as well.

Outreach Run across any new editors on New Jersey-related articles? Invite them to join WPNJ!
Ask a question, make an offer

Editor's Notes

Editor's news Must have been some winter holiday season in New Jersey, because the project talk page has been unusually quiet. I thought with all that snow, many of us would be inside and doing things here at WP. I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season and are enjoying a healthy and happy 2010!! - Jim Miller ^{See me | Touch me}

You are receiving this newsletter as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. To stop receiving these messages, remove your name here.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geotables and Chester NJ

I like the concept, but the formatting really stretched the article as it has to line up below the infobox. Is there a way to make it narrower (or maybe we move geography later in the article).Mattnad (talk) 15:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found a good solution. You may want to try it on other NJ pages you're improving. Mattnad (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning an expansion of article to include a "History" section. I ran into a similar problem as the geo table when I included a weather table [2]. Until there's more upfront content to push that table down, I'll leave it out.Mattnad (talk) 14:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Mlaurenti! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC) [reply]

End of NJ Turnpike

We don't call the GSP as the NJTP just because NJTA maintains it. Thus, the true north end of the turnpike remains at US 46 Famartin (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem Famartin (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1040167.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P1040167.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1040167.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P1040167.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:CR 612

That was done at the request of User:Mitchazenia. CR 612 was merged there as it is the continuation of Route 32. There are other examples of this in NJ such as County Route 638 (Atlantic County, New Jersey) redirecting to New Jersey Route 87. Dough 48 72 00:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CR 612 vs. NJ 32

No matter how it goes the plan is that CR 612s article will cease to exist, I suggested NJ 32 because its a better merge target over the county route lists. This is not entirely unprecedented, such as New York State Route 101 or New York State Route 178 having CR segments covered in SR articles. I live in Middlesex County, I've been on the entirety of CR 612, I know how it runs. However, we had to get rid of the article some way or another. CR 638 and NJ 87 also is a combination that works. Mitch32^{(There is a destiny that makes us... family.)} 13:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New York Metro Area bridges

Thank you for your input into the New York Metropolitan Area article as well as on my talk page - you appear to be an expert in transportation in New Jersey. I am, however, restoring the Driscoll bridge as well as the Tappan Zee Bridge (and adding the Newark Bay Bridge, upon your mention), as well as a couple of other Hudson Valley bridges, because these are integral bridges within the NY Metro Area. The fact that they don't connect to the five boroughs of New York City (which has its own article) is irrelevant. The whole idea behind my revision of the New York Metro Area article, surprisingly sparsely detailed beforehand, was to clearly differentiate the Metro Area from the City itself. Therein, if you are also an expert in major Westchester, Long Island, and/or Western Connecticut bridges, plese feel free to add them to the list. Thank you, Castncoot (talk) 01:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NJTP ramp opening dates

Hello, as possibly informative as including the dates when ramps were reconfigured might be, it makes the overall article inconsistent because the dates for the reconfigurations for many other interchanges aren't listed. I reverted the changes because of this inconsistency. In particular, there is no significant need to mention the "new ramps" at Exit 7A because the new interchange is essentially the same as the old interchange as far as connections go. Famartin (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So long as the new configuration is stressed, I would be OK with mentioning the date of Exit 8's reconfiguration.

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States Senate elections, 2008 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Senate elections, 1946, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:7a noise wall.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:80Expy Knowlton.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:P6070174.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:P6070174.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Senate elections, 1974, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stagnation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Turnpike Widening change from future tense to past tense

Sometimes, it seems easier to spend billions widening tens of miles of the New Jersey Turnpike than to update the affected articles to indicate that the work has been completed. Kudos for going through all of the articles, for all of the municipalities and counties, to reflect that the project has actually been completed. Alansohn (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New reply

You have received a reply from myself at Talk:United States Senate elections, 2018. I feel the same way you do about competitive US Senate seats. Classicalfan626 (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Knowlton Township, New Jersey and other corrections of NJTPA to DRJTBC

The mileage data lists mileage overseen by authorities without specifying the agency. In most cases the New Jersey Turnpike Authority is the body in question, but that's not always true. Despite my best efforts to list the correct agency, some slipped through the cracks and I thank you for the corrections as at Knowlton Township, New Jersey and other articles, especially where it is blindingly obvious that the Turnpike or Parkway don't even come close. The transportation edits are rounding out many of these articles. Thanks again. Alansohn (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Mlaurenti (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mlaurenti. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute in United States Senate elections, 2018 article

There is a two-way content dispute in the United States Senate elections, 2018 which we need others to give their opinions on. Can you join in on the talk page? Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mlaurenti. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mlaurenti. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PA080145.JPG

The file File:PA080145.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dark personal photo, barely shows subject, plenty of better photos on the bridge page already.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for the new year

I perked up when I saw your recent edits. Extending you my best wishes for the new year and my hopes that you'll have the interest and opportunity to be more active on Wikipedia. All the best for 2021. Alansohn (talk) 17:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alansohn: Thanks for your note. I'll try my best to be more active, so long as other circumstances don't interfere. Best to you as well for 2021. Mlaurenti (talk) 17:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]