User talk:Mladovesti

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which has a button "Cite" click on it
Then click on "Automatic" or "Manual"
For Manual: Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details, then click "Insert"
For Automatic: Paste the URL or PMID/PMC and click "Generate" and if the article is available on PubMed Central, Citoid will populate a citation which can be inserted by clicking "Insert"

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to use proper review articles consistently. The BMJ review is good. I have paraphrased it further.

A "Letter to the Editor" is not sufficient. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mladovesti, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mladovesti! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Library of World Literature (Khudozhestvennaya literatura)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Library of World Literature (Khudozhestvennaya literatura) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BoraVoro (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the first article I created, but I should admit that the last time I was creating or editing pages in Wikipedia was several years ago. Could you point kindly to omissions or mistakes I have made?

Kind regards, Mladovesti. Mladovesti (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy as books do not qualify for WP:A7, but since it is completely lacking in WP:REFERENCES the content cannot easily be verified, and notability is not established. Thus unless improved with references that are reliable, independent, and secondary, with significant coverage, it is unlikely to remain in the mainspace for long. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:982F:ED7D:D65A:B8D1 (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it better now?

Kind regards, Mladovesti Mladovesti (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has improved significantly, I can't say for sure how a discussion would go, but if all those are WP:SIGCOV there should be a strong case for keeping if listed at AFD, thanks for taking the time to find good sourcing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:C09F:BB30:DC09:AE86 (talk) 21:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mladovesti! Your additions to Library of World Literature have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Library of World Literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parrhasius. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Patrice Lumumba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, the text you added appeared to be non-neutral. DonIago (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, Doniago! I would be greatful if you restore the entry with a following quote:

"Lumumba in the Arts"

ISBN - 9789462701748, 9462701741

Published by Leuven University Press in 2000

Editor - Matthlas De Groof

Total number of pages - 463

Quoted pages - 201-205

I would also appreciate if you edit my entry to make it neutral.

Kind regards,

Mladovesti Mladovesti (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mladovesti, thanks for reaching out! I'm not really comfortable inserting edits on behalf of other editors, as if I do that I'm assuming responsibility for them, but you're welcome to undo my edit and insert the appropriate citation, and I'll tweak it if I feel there's any lingering concerns. If you need help figuring out the citation or such, I'm happy to assist! DonIago (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]