User talk:Mkd07

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Mkd07, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Marek.69 ^talk 14:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexandar Turunje

A tag has been placed on Alexandar Turunje requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Guy0307 (talk) 10:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Your Message

Hi Mkd07, I've left a response to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 01:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types/History

Hi Mkd07, your edits to Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types/History have been reverted. The stub templates and categories you listed do not exist, and have not been proposed. If you wish to propose new stub templates or categories, please do so at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals - do not simply add non-existent entries to that project's stub-type list. Thank you. Grutness...wha? 01:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Australian

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Macedonian Australian. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Ethnic group articles are entitled in singular, not plural form. This was discussed in length on talk page Kransky (talk) 00:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia we name things in their singular form, not plural, regardless if they are cats, apples, bulldozers or Macedonian Australians. See WP:SINGULAR. Kransky (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mechkin Kamen.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mechkin Kamen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Egumenoski Tome

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Egumenoski Tome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. blue520 09:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Berevo Lake.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Berevo Lake.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Mariovo

The article Battle of Mariovo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

8 hits on Google.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. • ɔ ʃ → 02:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Egumenoski Tome

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Egumenoski Tome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ibn (talk) 15:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georgi Sugarev

An article is not allowed to have redlinked categories on it — the red link means that the category does not exist. If you want the {{uncat}} tag to come off Georgi Sugarev, you need to find and add categories that actually exist. Bearcat (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Metody Patchev

If you want the {{uncat}} tag off the article, then the onus is on you to learn how to categorize articles properly. If you keep adding weird nonsense that doesn't even vaguely resemble proper category tags, the article is going to keep getting retagged as uncategorized again and again — if you want it to stop, then categorize the article properly. Bearcat (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ethnic clashes in Skopje, Macedonia

The article Ethnic clashes in Skopje, Macedonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS, reads like a coatrack for taking a jab at Albanians in Macedonia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with hoaxes

Please, stop creating hoaxes and provide reliable sources on your articles. At the beginning of the 20-th cetury ethnic Macedonians still didn't exist. Some battles you have described, as you did with the Battle of Skopje (1903) even didn't ever occured! Jingby (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Skopje (1903)

A tag has been placed on Battle of Skopje (1903) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear hoax infringement. Such battle never occured and you also didn't provide any source about it. I have checke the literature on the Ilinden uprising. In the Skopie revolutionary district, the revolutionary activity during the Ilinden uprising was symbolic. In the area IMRO was totally unprepared for military actions and failed to gain support among the local population. Regs! Jingby (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tome Egumenoski

The article Tome Egumenoski has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. De728631 (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Faculty of Agriculture and Food

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Faculty of Agriculture and Food requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RDN1F (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petar Egumenovski

The article Petar Egumenovski has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JohnCD (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice: references and notability

References: as you will see from two notices above, articles about living people are required to have at least one reference to confirm what they say, and will be deleted in ten days if none is provided. For Petar Egumenovski I tried to find one in the Faculty page on the University website, but he is not listed there. I have "moved" the article to a new title so that his surname comes second, which is the standard for biographical articles.

The Faculty already has an article at Faculty of Agricultural Science and Food in Skopje.

Notability: as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about article subjects: the criterion is called WP:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. For academics, the standard is explained at WP:Notability (academics) and for authors at WP:AUTHOR. It is not clear to me that either Petar or Tome meets this standard: please add references to show it, if you can. Before making a Wikipedia article about someone, it is well to be sure that they do met the notability standard, because it can cause embarrassment if an article is deleted and, for a time afterwards, a Google search for the name shows the deletion notice saying that the article has been deleted and the reason.

A small point: "Catergory" is a mis-spelling of "Category".

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hatczon

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Hatczon, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Makedonski Lav Mkd07 (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scupi and Macedonia Salutaris

Scupi was never included in Macedonia Secunda. Scupi became the capital of Dardania, which extended from Naissus to Bylazora in the second century BC. It is not clear when the Romans conquered Dardania and it seems quite probable that the Dardani actually lost independence in 28 BC.Scupi grew up as colony of legionnaires, mainly veterans of the Legio IIV Claudia in the time of Domitian (81-96 AD), even though several legions of the Crassus' army of 29-28 BC, may already have been stationed there, before the official imperial command in this area was instituted. Scupi was included in Moesia Superior after the province was formed in 6 AD. From 272 AD, it was colony inside the Roman province of Dardania after Dardania was established. Scupi was ravaged several times by barbarians, in 269 AD by the Goths, in 5th century AD by the Huns and finally in the year 518 AD was completely destroyed by an earthquake. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Hristo Tatarchev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikpedia! Please do not delede sourced info into articles, as you did to History of the Macedonians (ethnic group). Your edits appear to be unconstructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you deleted was not correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited Strumiani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Struma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Sliva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Sliva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Sliva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 08:19, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belzetia

Hi,

Thanks for starting the article about Belzetia. It would be helpful to have more information about the topic - and acceptable links that is the source of information for the article. If you'd like some help, please let me know.

In the meantime, I'll add an additional welcome section that also provides some information about writing articles for Wikipedia. Take care,--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additional welcome info

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akamir

A tag has been placed on Akamir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The'ChampionMan1234 07:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Akamir

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Akamir. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belzetia confusion

Hi Mkd, I'm not sure if there's been a misunderstanding about what needed to be done - or what the problem was but I've: 1) Squared away the disambiguation issue. Disambiguation is a term for a particular page that is not an article page, but is a page that provides a list of articles for a specific word or term, such as Avars. If you click on Avars, you'll see what I mean. Articles should not have links to disambiguation pages... cause it will just confuse the reader. Instead, the correct article name should be used to route the reader to the correct place. If you have a chance to take a look at the change I made, that would be great!!! 2) It seems the link that you keep adding to the article acts like a virus. It definitely doesn't seem to route to a regular web page. I could be missing something though, like maybe the link has a typo. Are you trying to do something there that is helpful for the article?

Please let me know if I can help in some way.--CaroleHenson (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rynchines

The article Rynchines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

machine translation

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bulwersator (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petrovden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rynchines

Thanks for creating Rynchines, Mkd07!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, may need expansion further references etc.

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belzetia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of provinces of Macedonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of provinces of Macedonia for deletion

Hi, Mkd07. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of provinces of Macedonia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. Jingiby (talk) 12:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belzetia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aeolia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Belzetia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Belzetia is only attested once, in 799. It has nothing to do with ancient Aeolia, and since it is a hapax we cannot possibly know anything of its history to be able to tell in which periods it was under Byzantine sovereignty. Judging by the wrong information and fake referencing you gave in Akamir, citing Setton for things that were not in his paper, or this ludicrous edit, this is deliberate in pursuit of some nationalist agenda. Please stop. Constantine ✍ 08:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zagorcani

The article Zagorcani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

12 hits on Google, but no one for such Tribe.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Zagorcani. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Zagorcani. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 15:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]