User talk:Mitchazenia/Archive19

Re:3 FTs....

Job done - rst20xx (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I just went ahead and did 4, before I forget how to do it and have to re-learn again - rst20xx (talk) 21:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you provide me with the original text to the article that you deleted on M5 fiber in august 2008? Although I agree with the assessment of advertising, the topic of the article is certainly more relevant than some road in the middle of nowhere, in my view. The stuff we're talking about could end up saving a bunch of lives. Please put it on my talk page.Sikkema (talk) 11:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radcliffe, Greater Manchester

Hi there, I wonder if you wouldn't mind striking through some of your comments here, if you're happy with the replies? Parrot of Doom (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go Syracuse?

I noticed that you use that in your signature. So either you're anti-Rochester, think Erie Boulevard is beautiful, or love lake effect snow, but I'm hoping you are an SU alum. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 21:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's not to love about lake effect snow? –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 02:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pennsylvania Route 343

On 23 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pennsylvania Route 343, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Pennsylvania Route 368

Hello! Your submission of Pennsylvania Route 368 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NE2 21:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Word on the street

I noticed in the GA review process talk page, under possible changes, that your username came up as one of the people inadvertently leading to this change in GA strategy. Why aren't they happy with the GAR/GAN/GAC articles you submit which are passed? I thought we had a process to deal with that, should an article pass GA which didn't meet criteria. Just curious. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was the GA competition that was mentioned, although they made another comment concerning people who submit numerous GAs, but review few. I'm as guilty as anyone else when it comes to the latter (for me it's 52 including the two GARs in progress versus 11 reviewed,) because some articles either aren't within the area of my strongest expertise, or I know can be better reviewed by others within the project. I tend to take in the orphans which have been on the list for 3 weeks or so. While I can be picky during reviews, I'd rather review the articles which are clearly passable or clearly unpassable. No muss, no fuss. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

Juliancolton (talk) is wishing you happy holidays! This greeting promotes WikiLove and holiday wishes. Hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a season's greetings, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Juliancolton/Holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Truth

I was afraid of that. :-( I'm planning on getting back to work soon. I wholeheartedly agree with you; this has been with me long enough. --Dylan 620 _Contribs ^Sign! 15:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing: my interests. They include tropical cyclones, as well as something that is related to Wikipedia policy; the banning of users. I hope to get a couple disambiguation pages for tropical cyclones in today (they'll be my first articles since the Timeline of the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season; my first decent article, but then again, you've come up with hundreds

). Also, I got your reply while typing up this addendum; sorry, can't help you with roads at the moment. :-( Maybe I could help copyedit, but I need to wait until I have sufficient prose skills. Before I get back to serious work for the first time in a month, I have one thing to ask you; how come you have always included the number "32" in your signature? Cheers, Dylan 620 _Contribs ^Sign! 15:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing featured portal drive for Portal:Finger Lakes

Hey, I've been doing some work for the featured portal drive for Portal:Finger Lakes. We could use some more DYKs, so I have been compiling a list of redlinked articles from various Finger Lake related articles, and listing them at Portal:Finger Lakes/Things you can do. I will probably do some research and write a few new articles on some of those, so if you plan to create some of them as well that would help out a bit, do you think you would be interested in writing new articles and getting them to T:DYK for any of those redlinks? Cirt (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Created Tadodaho and submitted it to T:TDYK for consideration, if that successfully makes it to T:DYK then we'd have 8 more DYK hooks to go to flesh out Portal:Finger Lakes/DYK. (Additional possibilities for new articles at Portal:Finger Lakes/Things you can do.) Happy New Year! Cirt (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup

Delivered by neuro^(talk) for Garden and aye matthew at 20:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Dear Mitchazenia,

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

Kind regards,

Majorly talk 21:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy adminship anniversary!

Wishing Mitchazenia/Archive19 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Dylan 620 (Contribs · Sign!) 00:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 1 - January 2009

|} |}

DYK for Pennsylvania Route 664

On 3 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pennsylvania Route 664, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 13:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #23

The November–December issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Claus, Arizona

Thanks for your review of Santa Claus, Arizona. At the time, I was in the middle of an RfA and plan to address your comments. I will try to get them soon. -- Suntag ☼ 16:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the USRD-CRWP Cup

Hello, Mitchazenia, and welcome to the USRD-CRWP Cup. This is just a reminder that the contest will start at 00:00 UTC on Saturday (about 4 PM Pacific and about 7 PM Eastern on Friday). Nominations must be made after that time to count for the contest.

Currently, there is only one pool for contestants. Please feel free to invite any Wikipedia user to join. We need a few more users to get another pool.

It is unknown when the first round will end; however, it will last at least 3 weeks.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 01:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of County Route 74 (Rockland County, New York)

Hello! Your submission of County Route 74 (Rockland County, New York) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NE2 08:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 84 in New York

I don't know if you noticed or not, but I recently created this article (the first state-segment one on the eastern I-84), and it could use the things you usually give it (I found a great DYK nom fact, and you and (maybe) Julian can get co-credit for it if you want). That would be some references for the road description and the beginnings of a history (I'd like to move some NY-specific stuff out of the main article, which would help clean it up). Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, Route 28A, you won't let me forget that one! Tell ya what ... I'll put the pic in and write the desc as an extra incentive to get you to work on this (not that I think you really need it :-)).

Sorry I missed you in Hartford yesterday. Really, I had pondered going all week but the weather forecast just (ahem) iced it. See you in NY next weekend and, perhaps, Hartford again the week after. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter

Delivered by The Helpful One for Garden and iMatthew at 00:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

You're invited!

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we can team up. My son will be with us if that's not a problem (I don't think he'll be acting that way again, certainly not on the subway). Daniel Case (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Yeah, it has been awhile. How've you been? Are you going to Syracuse now or going to be? I see it in your signature. You'd be up in my old stomping grounds! --Airtuna08 (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They look good. Hopefully the ones you nominated for GA status will get there. --Airtuna08 (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still holding that against me:p... well, I'll look at it and may make some clarifications or copy edits. And how far are you guys along with the NY State Routes? They look good! --Airtuna08 (talk) 00:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, send me the information on how to connect to it and I'll think about it. --Airtuna08 (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check out some of the new images I uploaded. I went up to Cortland to visit my sister and got picture happy. Enjoy! --Airtuna08 (talk) 05:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Port of Albany-Rensselaer

I am confused as to your addition to the Port of Albany-Rensselaer. You added a cleanup template to the references and made the mention that the references were missing alot of things? This doesnt make sense. The reviewer in the GA nomination (which the article just passed) was the one that fixed up the references before passing it. I dont understand what you want added/cleaned up. If you are going to be critical and claim an article needs help then it would be helpful to let people know (on the talk page perhaps?) what needs to be done. I want the article to be the best it can be, but without knowing what needs to be done I cant do that.Camelbinky (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me? It JUST got passed as a GA within the last 48 hours probably and you are already saying it DOESNT meet the standards anymore? I have looked up Wikipedia: Citing sources and dont see where information is missing. The cite web references ONLY need url, author/publisher, date, and title. Everything else is optional for cite web. The cite book references have the author, page, title, and isbn number. Please be specific about what you believe is lacking. Your message to me gave me nothing about what you believe needs to be fixed. If I dont hear anything specific the cleanup template will be removed. This is a GA article, NOT a FA article. The standards are less and the article wouldnt have passed GA status the way it is if it didnt meet it.Camelbinky (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal. I just went ahead and added the access dates, although a handful might still need them. Gary King (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I already thanked Gary for his hard work but I am still confused and need a bit of clarification. Perhaps when you are not in a "foul mood". The cite web sources DID have access dates, they were just in a form that does not show up in the references section, you can only see them in edit mode. Which I believe is just fine according to the MOS. If I am wrong please let me know. I believe the problem you have could possibly be that you are going on the information on the article page itself and you have not checked the citations in edit mode. I once had someone try and delete an article because they claimed it had sat there for over a year without any improvements because they did not look clearly at the history and see that it had been a redirect up until a few weeks before being turned into an article, and then after putting it up for deletion refused any further explanation. (the article was voted in favor of keep after 4 days, 4-0) I am just using that as an example of how, sometimes, a little research under the surface and a little explanation and elaboration can help a long way to understanding. I am sorry I was snippy, GA review was tough and my first time sending an article through it. I took offence at your tone, as you did to mine. I sincerly apologize. As I first stated in my initial response- I just needed to know specifics so the issue could be rectified. A very generic template and vague responses help no one or the article. I had no issue with your comments in general, just wanted to get it fixed as soon as possible.Camelbinky (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Thanks for the review on the Italian GP. As for FAC, a very similar article of mine is the one just above yours at FAC... Aptery gial 22:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter

Mystery building id'ed

This is the building next to Kingsbridge Road. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I logged on but I get "oops! You don't have permission to view this page". Can that be arranged? (My Flickr username is the same as it is here). (No, I'm sorry, we didn't get the video. My son was scared of the locomotive and preferred to watch the train leave from the safety of the glass where the escalator came down). Daniel Case (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have started making the uploads to Flickr (three photos so far). How do they look? Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even logged on, I'm still getting "private page". Daniel Case (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PA 823 GA review

Hi. Just in case you haven't seen, I've finished reviewing Pennsylvania Route 823 and have placed it on hold for fixes and clarifications. Let me know on the review page if you have any questions or comments. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 14:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Yip Pin Xiu

Hello, Mitchazenia. Thanks for offering to review Yip Pin Xiu's GA nomination. It has been three days and you have neither created the review subpage nor left a note on the article's talk page. I thought I should remind you, in case you are busy, had forgotten about your offer to review the article or had marked it as under review by mistake. Before reviewing, you may wish to read the last section of the talk page, where I mentioned a few things for the reviewer to note. --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Mitch,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Staten Island Ferry terminal.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 25, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-01-25. howcheng {chat} 17:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey Route 10 and 23 GA Reviews

I have gone back and made changes to both the Route 10 and Route 23 articles. I just have one concern with both articles about the route description. On the review page, you stated that both articles have too much technical information. I need some clarification as to what is wrong: is there possibly too many county routes and mile marker numbers in the route description? Dough4872 (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Fiona Apple

Hi there! You reviewed the article I created, List of awards and nominations received by Rufus Wainwright, when I nominated it for FL status. I am currently working on a similar list for Fiona Apple. Here is a link to peer review, after which I will be attempting to get the list FL status as well. If you have a few minutes, I would appreciated any suggestions you may have. If not, thanks again for your help with the Wainwright awards list. Best wishes! -Whataworld06 (talk) 03:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the peer review has ended, and the article is now up for FL status. Just an FYI - thanks! -Whataworld06 (talk) 21:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter

17:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of County Route 97 (Rockland County, New York)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article County Route 97 (Rockland County, New York), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article does not meet the guidelines of Wikipedia:Notability (highways).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Andy 1One (talk) 02:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for County Route 35 (Warren County, New York)

On January 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article County Route 35 (Warren County, New York), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

County Route 97

Would you agree to merger between this article and the main one? Andy 1One (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could not remove the AfD template because of Wikipedia policy. The template states that it cannot be removed until the issue has been resolved. Andy 1One (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WQA

Hi there. This is to notify you that you are the subject of a Wikiquette alert located here. You may wish to respond. Cheers, Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NY 382

I was looking at examples of nice GA's and saw this article, which you edit a lot. Very interesting article! I see you edit it a lot. Chergles (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think a NY map showing the location of Red House would be good for the NY 382 article? The trouble is that the map in the Red House, New York article is a bit off. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_House,_New_York . Chergles (talk) 16:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mitchazenia!!!

Hey hey! Long time, no read! How goes things, what happened on mIRC? What happened with this? You know, I'm also pretty much of an a-hole IRL, but I try like Hades to tone it down when I'm in Wiki, you never know who's gonna take offense to what. Write me back, fill me in! Edit Centric (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mitchazenia. You have new messages at Edit Centric's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit Centric (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Mitchazenia. You have new messages at Edit Centric's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit Centric (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WQA

Hello. I am posting this here just to make sure you see it, as I don't know if you are planning on visiting the WQA page again any time soon. The same text below is posted there. I would just suggest you try your best to avoid violating any of the wikipedia policies that you can, and if that is not possible, maybe you would benefit from taking a wikibreak or cutting back you time on Wikipedia so you are able to moderate your responses to other editors. Quoted text below:

We value useful contributions by anyone, regardless of who they are in real life. However, for contributions to be useful they also have to follow all of the guidelines and policies, especially the civility guidelines and guidelines against personal attacks. You need to be able to deal in a civil manner with other editors on Wikipedia. Your personal issues are, as you say, personal and none of anyone's business. However, saying "its who I am in real life" and "its not something I can solve" does not give you a free pass; you still have to follow the rules of Wikipedia or eventually an admin will block you. I suggest, if you have to type something like that in the future, you type it and then walk away without saving, or type it out in a notebook application or some such, and not post anything on Wikipedia until you are calm enough to remove any uncivil or attacking comments. However you want to do it, I strongly suggest you do NOT make similar comments in the future as per the above cited Wikipedia guidelines.

End quote. Thanks for your time and good luck The Seeker 4 Talk 19:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mitchazenia. You have new messages at Edit Centric's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit Centric (talk) 03:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Ridge Road GA

Hi. Just letting you know that I've finsihed reviewing the article. It's mostly in good shape -- just a bunch of prose issues and minor clarifications. Let me know on the review page when you've made changes. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 15:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NYS 382 suggestion

Should we note that the construction of the road took place some time between the 1920's and 1930? I am trying to locate a source. We know that it was not in a 1920's postcard but did appear by 1930. Chergles (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

File:City hall and clothespin.JPG

You're invited to the
Seventh Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
March 15, 2009
Time: 3:00 PM

RSVP

(view/edit this template)

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: You're invited!

Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mitch

I went up to the Albany area to see a friend for Super Sunday. But get this, I got up at 7am and took US 9 all the way from here to Renssalaer County getting pictures along the way. I'm in the process of getting them up. Got about 200 or so! It's so addicting!

How's CR 97 coming? Hope the article stays, I only offered merge to that guy cause I didn't want him to go after the other routes. I know there's been fighting amongst people over county routes before. Looks like his AfD failed which was good. Hope its going well man! --Airtuna08 (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

K, don't answer my call:) All done uploading the images I got from that trip. --Airtuna08 (talk) 06:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking. Now I'm bored without any new images in my camera. I'll have to figure out another trip for myself:p. Also, I want to try and get the Palisades Interstate Parkway article up to FA level. I need to read all of the FA standard stuff, but do you have any advice for me on how to get started with that and if you think it has a legitimate chance of getting there? Thanks! --Airtuna08 (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 3, Issue 2 - Feburary 2009

|} |}

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NY 382

If you are in New York, is it possible to find additional print references to NY 382? If in Albany, maybe there are old budget documents or documents showing the discontinuation of the route number. The material probably exists, it just is hard to find online because it may be in print only. Chergles (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know that some people hate the tiny road! Chergles (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know turning an article into a FA would be so difficult! Chergles (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have won Round 1 of the USRD-CRWP WikiCup!

Congratulations! You have been declared a winner of Round 1. This is just to let you know that Round 2 will be starting Sunday night. Please note the point value changes for Round 2 as well. --Rschen7754 (T C) 08:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask

That you come to me with any concerns you have before reporting me to Wiki authority. I have every right to have an opinion just as you. I have been civil in my approach. I haven't attacked any users or authors from your article. The most I did was use capital letters, which has been discussed. I responded to your claims on the sockpuppet page. You can review that if you want. But you shouldn't go after people just because you disagree. A lot of you on the otherside of my arguments sound alike. --GroundhogTheater (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter

20:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Airtuna08 autoblock

He says he's still autoblocked (I unblocked him last night) but I can't find him in the listings to undo the autoblock. Can you help him out? Tks. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now. See his talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of New Jersey Route 161

The article New Jersey Route 161 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Jersey Route 161 for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Eustress (talk) 02:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of New Jersey Route 182

The article New Jersey Route 182 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Jersey Route 182 for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Eustress (talk) 02:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]