User talk:Mister what

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Sara Lumholdt, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy (film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dave Bautista, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Prefall 20:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spectre

Please do not just dump the same text back in. There were three main issues which were identified in both removals:

There are no sources used;
There are too many Americanisations in the article, which is in BrEng;
The quotes are too long. They need to be trimmed down to a more appropriate length.

Thank you. – SchroCat (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please desist from edit warring your preferred version of text back into the article, against the MoS. There is a thread open on your wording, which you should visit and comment. You will find the link to the section of the MoS which points out why your edit is poor. –'SchroCat (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Spectre (2015 film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See SPECTRE's TALK PAGE

See SPECTRE's TALK PAGE. If you include again, at least have the decency to include an edit comment on WHY you want it included (which looking at your edit history sadly isn't something you seem to do!). It would be much appriciate by all than being silent, and sad that it seems other editors have had a problem with you on same page. 82.37.3.182 (talk) 12:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dave Bautista, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Prefall 13:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pretty Little Liars, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Regarding this edit, I suggest you read the WP:TVCAST guideline. Cast is listed according to the order they appear in the credits from the first episode of the series. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. City Of Silver 15:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mister what. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Spider-Man: Homecoming and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

Please stop making the same edits on these pages since they have been reverted by multiple editors. If disagree with the reversions, the appropriate action is to start a discussion on the talk pages. For reference, please see WP:BRD. - DinoSlider (talk) 16:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crazy Rich Asians (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nico Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crazy Rich Asians (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nico Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crazy Rich Asians (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nico Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Avengers: Infinity War. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crazy Rich Asians (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nico Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Avengers: Infinity War, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mister what. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crazy Rich Asians (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nico Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Avengers: Infinity War— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mister what, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Sandrobost (talk) 14:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding in Avengers Infinity War on the audience reaction section

I felt that i want to add the other popular meme that came from Drax The Destroyer who said that line “Why is Gamora?” and his invisibility gag, and i’ve been told that it’s edited back because of lack of construction or whatever and what should i do? It was only a minor edit Mister what (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to cite a reliable source saying that it's notable. DonQuixote (talk) 09:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Avengers: Infinity War, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 02:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Avengers: Infinity War. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sandrobost (talk) 12:51, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term repeated additions of unsourced content, edit warring, and failure to communicate.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm {talk} 15:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]