User talk:Missruption

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Missruption! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on the Jenner FAQ and overall good edits and adherence to policy on Bruce Jenner. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you! Missruption (talk) 21:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage adherence to policy and guidelines. Being given a barn star from another editor for doing so, should be seen as an excellent start for a new editor.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		The Jenner FAQ was very well done. Mark Miller (talk) 19:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Missruption (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlyn Jenner article.

I brought the issue of hormone replacement therapy to the talk page and you have engaged in warring your POV edit back in again. Can you please state your reason or discuss on the article talk page? Also note that super duper sanctions are in effect for the article-thanksChangalangaIP (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning and accusations have been seen. The issue remains that whatever hormones Jenner was taking the helpful article for those wanting to learn more is HRT. That's how Wikipedia works, you get the best article for now, not the one it could be. Missruption (talk) 00:25, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed some of your recent edit to Caitlyn Jenner does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Caitlyn Jenner

I understand your passion on this topic, but you appear to be edit warring with regards to the lead of Caitlyn Jenner. Please seek other forms of content dispute resolution (click here for examples). EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LOL at you getting owned for spazzing out over the Jenner article. Guess you should find some other noble cause to crusade for, Social Justice Loser. 2605:E000:7E07:C500:60C0:6D2D:5914:B046 (talk) 07:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shane Ortega for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane Ortega is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Ortega until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mooonswimmer 15:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]