User talk:MissingMia

An invitation to the Teahouse!

Hello! MissingMia, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 00:38, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prometheus

"net word count now reduced so that can't be used as an excuse for deleting constructive contributions"

It was not an excuse, it is an unnecessary detail. Unless you have some ulterior motive for him doing it, he does it because they don't have the equipment or staff to deal with a pregnancy especially an alien one. The only important part is she finds out it is inside her, she gets it removed. Don't be bitchy in edit summaries, it's tedious. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

replied to this bitchy and tedious comment on Darwarriorblake's talk page.MissingMia (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waterloo in popular culture, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SPI and GDW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Michael Heseltine. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. Replied to on Theroadislong's talk page.MissingMia (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]