User talk:Mishkoti

Welcome!

Hello, Mishkoti, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Provide an Edit summary
Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken 21:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)^(talk)[reply]

Addition of http://saccharinist.blogspot.com to various articles

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . Please do not add irrelevant websites to articles - it is considered vandalism. Rgds, - Trident13 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have not left irrelevant links on Wikipedia, who are you to judge that? All of my links were completely relevant and not vandalism. Just because you don't agree with the content of my links does not allow you to edit them out. You should have more respect for contributors. added by Mishkoti

Have you read the wikipedia guidelines at WP:Links? Can I suggest you do this first before complaining about my or other editors removal of multiple links to the same website which you have added, which add no additional value to articles. You added three links alone in one edit to the Borat article on the revision as of 13:08 at 15 November, 2006, to one website. Rgds, - Trident13 20:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of my links, including the one for Zahra Amir Ebrahimi and the ones for Borat offer new information which your entries do not include. You even lifted one of the Saccharinist's links and put it on the Ebrahimi page so you've proven yourself that the Saccharinist had much to offer to that entry. The Borat links clearly substantiate criticisms of Borat the character and Cohen the actor which are legitimate and worthwhile. You even left a comment for the Saccharinist, so again you prove the interest value and relevance of those links. If you are unwilling to post links that you do not like, then please refer me to an editor that is less biased. Thank you.added by Mishkoti

I don't know what you are refereing to. I have not added any links to the articles to which your refer, where you have added your blog SPAM link http://saccharinist.blogspot.com. Please read WP:Links and stop adding this link which fails wikipedia's guidelines, and which I and other editors will resultantly continue removing. Rgds, - Trident13 18:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolutionary Poets Brigade

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Revolutionary Poets Brigade, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Chris857 (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahnaz Badihian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahnaz Badihian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahnaz Badihian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]