User talk:Mipchunk

Welcome!

Hello, Mipchunk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 18:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dabney Hovse edit

Mipchunk, I don't know what more you want from us.

Sincerely, Dabney Hovse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlai (talk • contribs) 08:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Head-Royce School

Thank you for your work on the article "Head-Royce School". I am going to change the controversial sentence to "Until 1957, the school prohibited African American children, but has since embraced diversity as a core value", if that is fine with affected parties. Hopefully that sentence is NPOV enough. It acknowledges the racist sentiments of the past and the progress that the school has made since then. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions or objections. Cashcraft 20:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited :)

Please accept this invite to join the new WikiProject Bodybuilding, a WikiProject dedicated to improving bodybuilding related articles. Simply click here to accept! Addbot (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

The edit Botdotcom did to your userpage is not vandalism in the slightest (besides making a mistake on one of the userboxes, which I - its operator - apologise for, the mistake has been corrected).

The edit summary referenced the German userbox solution which is indeed a valid URL. Please do read that page as it explains why I userfied userboxes.

Quite simply, this is a userbox you had on your page: Template:User 0.9 equals 1. If you click on this links, you will find messages of "This userbox has been moved..". I merely updated the links for you.

If you check your userpage, you will find that since I've corrected the edit, your userboxes look fine. In future, please check the bot's page and ask questions if you're not sure of something; don't jump the gun and assume vandalism. I'm an experienced editor with around 10,000 edits, why would I choose now of all times to vandalise?

However, if that's not it at all and you're referring to this edit, I've removed the userbox. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 13:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Welcome to the new WikiProject Bodybuilding!

Thank you for joining! Firstly, please add {{WikiProject Bodybuilding}}, {{User WikiProject Bodybuilding}} or simply [[Category:WikiProject Bodybuilding Members]] to your user page which adds a banner, userbox or simply our member's category. Then please take a look here to see how you can help! Please contact me if I can assist in anyway, and thanks again! - Glen 09:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CPS article

Hi there Mipchunk! I read your comment on SeanMcG's talk page. Thanks for keeping an eye on the CPS article, and for asking more direct questions. Cheers, Mrs. H 68.122.14.4 03:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mipchunk...Thanks for editing my entry to the CPS page. I'm obviously still a bit shaky on all the guidelines etc, and my style has never been fantastic. But my next edit will be much better, I promise! Scobiedont (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)scobiedont[reply]

Help

Hallo, could you help me. What does this mean in 'plain' english. 'As per preferences page Raw signature (If unchecked, the contents of the box above will be treated as your nickname and link automatically to your user page; if checked, the contents should be source code, including all links. Don't use images, templates, or external links in your signature) ' Any help would be much appreciated. Culnacréann 14:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your help. I think he Gnevin wants me to stop using the flag of Ireland in my sig. as it's an image. Thanks again and Greetings from Ireland

Culnacréann 18:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Academic Talent Development Program, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. EMT1871 02:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ian King

Can you take a look at the article on Ian King. Currently it seems that subject lack notability big time. Aditya Kabir 15:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics CotW

Hey Mip, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks--Cronholm144 23:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HRS Jayhawk.gif

Hello, Mipchunk. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:HRS Jayhawk.gif) was found at the following location: User talk:Mipchunk. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hrslogo.gif

Hello, Mipchunk. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Hrslogo.gif) was found at the following location: User talk:Mipchunk. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dan the Automator

I found a source! I don't know why it didn't show up in google, but I went to sfgate dot com and found it. article here Julian Maestas 14:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Cpsemblem.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Cpsemblem.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Cpsemblem.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zedla (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CPS emblem

Thanks for the heads-up. I tinkered with the notice a bit and removed the speedy deletion tag; we'll see if that does the trick. Happy turkey day(s)! Her Pegship (tis herself) 20:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bentley High School

Bentley High School, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Bentley High School satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bentley High School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Bentley High School during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rtphokie (talk) 15:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hrslogo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hrslogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla (talk) 06:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tyson Gay

I've recently done a complete rewrite of the article and nominated it for Good Article status. Seeing as you've contributed to the article previously I'd appreciate your input. I've specifically tried to make it not too "stat-y" and some minor meeting wins have been removed for conciseness. I'd like to know what you think. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 07:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. I agree that much is said. Like Usain Bolt, I imagine that as things go on I will reduce the information. I'm actually considering subarticles as a way of doing this after seeing User:YellowMonkey's recent strange GA Cricket spurt. Thus, wikipedia can contain both a very indepth analysis of the topic and a general overview. To be honest, I'm still getting to grips with how long things should be. It doesn't help that most Featured articles tend to be very long when sourcing permits anyway...I always think "at least it won't be John McCain big". Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Athletics

Fancy organising that 95% of your contributions into the collaborative WikiProject? I know you're not very active at the moment but I'd appreciate it if you added yourself to the participants list so we can get the ball rolling! Cheers. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{WIKIPROJECT ATHLETICS NEEDS YOU!} 11:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mipchunk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 328 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Robert Boyce - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Track and field athletics

That is a massive rewrite of a very important article. Rather than simply reverting it, I'd rather open up a discussion, knowing the previous contents, developed over years through the eyes of numerous editors including myself, are still saved in the article's history. I'll forward a version of this note to User:Sillyfolkboy so this discussion can be included amongst other of the project's contributors.

In my eyes, its not entirely bad for the article to include numerous categories, and to run long. As open as the previous version looked, all the different categories of discussion were relatively brief and to the point--a few might have needed some tidying. This main page is our portal to the many specific sub-articles about the sport. You've deleted a lot of material, some of it is NOT duplicated in such an orderly fashion anywhere else--most particularly the list of events that has been going through some recent evolution. Sub-articles could be created to make up for those deletions, but the trend on Wikipedia is to merge down lesser significant items into a master article, which this was. Users tend to want to get their information in one place, rather than having to search blindly through multiple articles to get their basic information. As I tour Wikipedia, I still find interesting articles that should link back to this main page, with an introduction. Eliminating as much as you did, there is less organized opportunity for such links. Some of the parts you kept are lesser significant addendum to parts you deleted. The sport is a literal three ring circus, with lots of things involved. Our main article should include that aspect rather than filtering out significant information in favor of brevity.

In the interest of brevity and my time, I'm not going to dive into all the specifics yet. You have one opinion, I have another and I think many more interested minds should be heard from before such a massive edit is finalized.Trackinfo (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to prevent any overlap: I'm working on writing the basic track and field page today. I should have something significant to show by tomorrow. Here's to grand ambitions! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 18:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Running

Wikiproject Running has been serving Wikipedia since 2006 as a subgroup of Wikiproject Sports. I see that you have shown an interest in running-related articles and would welcome you to join our group. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 20:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Athletics Happy New Year

Wishing you a Happy New Year on behalf of WikiProject Athletics! You can read of some of the project's achievements this year at the project talk page (please feel free to add your own thoughts and achievements!). SFB 18:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mipchunk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mipchunk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from X Rebirth into X4: Foundations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]