User talk:Minim NF

This is Minim NF's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Equatorial (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"a renowned chain of hospitality establishments that have left an indelible mark in Asia, offering exceptional experiences to travellers and patrons alike. This article explores the legacy and journey of Equatorial Hotels, from its inception to its diversified portfolio of luxurious accommodations, fine dining, and hospitality services."

"pioneering a new era in hospitality development"

" introducing iconic properties across different cities, each contributing to its rich tapestry of hospitality excellence."

", each providing a unique culinary experience:"

"A stylish poolside bar, the perfect spot to unwind and enjoy breathtaking views and get sundowner cocktails"

"Blue: Offers tantalising snacks and handcrafted cocktails Étoile Bistro: Serves scrumptious grab-and-go selections, freshly baked pastries and bread and a bistro-style menu with a wide selection of ice-cold craft beer"

All of this is marketing nonsense that needs to be cut out. Other examples throughout.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel Equatorial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 06:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minim NF! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 06:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello Minim NF. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Hotel Equatorial, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Minim NF. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Minim NF|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Equatorial (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hotel Equatorial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, Seraphimblade!

I have read the email and wanted to revise my article draft, but my account has been blocked.

Firstly, I did not write the article to advertise or promote my organization. I was supposed to write about the hotel's history from 1973 until 2024. I have tried a few times to revise the text to become neutral in tone, which suits Wikipedia's terms, but it still does not meet the requirements.

I am still new to using Wikipedia, and I am still figuring out how to edit the post. I hope that you can still consider unblocking me, and I will edit the whole article to a neutral point.

Thank you. Minim NF (talk) 00:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to request unblock on your original account. Sockpuppet accounts are not unblocked. While that account remains blocked, you may not edit Wikipedia, under any account or anonymously; the block applies to you as an individual, not to a particular account. I will tell you right now that I will not unblock you to write about the organization, but you may place an unblock appeal to see if anyone else will. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Minim NFPlease use the unblock template to notify administrators. Also, socks aren't unblockable. AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 00:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i already send my request to be unblocked Minim NF (talk) 04:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Minim NF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the email and wanted to revise my article draft, but my account has been blocked. Firstly, I did not write the article to advertise or promote my organization. I was supposed to write about the hotel's history from 1973 until 2024. I have tried a few times to revise the text to become neutral in tone, which suits Wikipedia's terms, but it still does not meet the requirements. I am still new to using Wikipedia, and I am still figuring out how to edit the post. I hope that you can still consider unblocking me, and I will edit the whole article to a neutral point Minim NF (talk) 04:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted, you need to request unblock from your original account. 331dot (talk) 05:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.