User talk:Mini4me

Clipbucket

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clipbucket, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://blog.clip-bucket.com/tag/features. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Clipbucket

I have nominated Clipbucket, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clipbucket. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 03:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Toon 22:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

The article Clipbucket would be governed by the notability guidelines on companies and the notability guidelines on web material. The rule of thumb here is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in sources that are reliable and independent of the company (excluding company PR releases and information solely available on the company website—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by independent sources). All material must be attributable. Now that the article has been through deletion debate, you will almost certainly need to assemble a good many such sources to demonstrate notability. See Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? for some other ideas. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The listing at [1] is a press release. Note the byline: "By: Press Release" I'm afraid it is not an independent source. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have never viewed the other article of which you speak, but you should review WP:OTHERSTUFF for an explanation of why it has no bearing. For examples of reliable sources discussing web content, see [2], [3] and [4], for a few. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I think I see why you are confused. It might help you to review our article on press release. But in brief, press releases are public relations releases that are prepared by companies themselves. This is different than a news article independently prepared by a news media agency. While these are often referred to as "the press", their articles are not "press releases" unless they are writing about themselves. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me quote from the relevant notability guidelines in the hope that this will clarify things for you.

From WP:ORG

The "secondary sources" in the criterion include reliable published works in all forms, such as (for example) newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following:
Press releases; autobiographies; advertising for the company, corporation, organization, or group; and other works where the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself—whether published by the company, corporation, organization, or group itself, or re-printed by other people.

From WP:WEB

The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations except for the following:
Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site.

(footnotes omitted).

Public relations releases may not be used to substantiate notability. It doesn't matter who reproduced it; if it is a press release, it cannot be used to establish notability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I can't. There are policies that determine what I delete. If you think that the article does not meet notability guidelines, you are welcome to nominate it for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion process for how this is done. I will recommend that if you decide to nominate it for deletion debate that you explain why it fails to meet the inclusion guidelines without referring to your own article; reviewers of the debate need only consider the article under its own merits. I do see that it's been tagged for poor referencing and notability concerns for over a month now. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clipbucket

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clipbucket, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sailsbystars (talk • contribs • email) 00:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clipbucket

I have responded at my talk page. Step hen 22:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]