User talk:Milonica/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Milonica. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Replaceable fair use File:Webbhillscreen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Webbhillscreen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 08:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Digital Broadcasting Technologies
Hi Milonica. I'm someone from Egypt & I'm interested to know about digital broadcasting technologies. I saw comments of yours at talk:CAM-D. I read on your page that you are in WikiProject Radio, so as you are interested in DXing. I read a lot about digital radio broadcasting technologies (HD Radio - FMeXtra - CAM-D ... & others), but wanted to take a word of a mouth. I wanted to ask you:
- Does the regular person (in America) know about digital radio broadcasting?
- Does the general public seem to care about these technologies?
- Are digital radio broadcasting technologies used widely?
- Do you find digital radio broadcasting more robust?
- Could they be received further than analog?
- Do these technologies really sound better in quality?
- Do you care to use any of these technologies?
- What technology do you prefer from all of digital radio broadcasting technologies?
We have no terrestrial digital radio broadcasting in Egypt, so I was wondering how does it look like. Thanks in advance :) --Mahmudmasri (talk) 04:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Answer
To answer your questions:
- 1)Hard to say, most people probably hear the ads for HD Radio but it doesn't seem like people know much about it.
- 2)HD Radio hasn't seen very much adoption by consumers. People just don't seem to care that they can hear new stations.
- 3)On FM yes, AM (Mediumwave) not so much. There are over 1400 FM stations in the US broadcasting HD Radio.
- 4)No, HD Radio has many flaws and suffers from poor range compared to its analog counterpart. The audio benefits are negligible on FM, but noticeable on AM.
- 5)No, as I said above, HD Radio suffers from poorer range, and where the analog can't be received, the HD signal can't be received.
- 6)As I've mentioned, the audio quality on FM is really hard to notice a difference. On AM, HD Radio sounds close to FM, but depending on the station, the audio sounds compressed, and has digital artifacts. FM suffers from the same thing when the station has more than one stream (i.e. HD2, 3 etc).
- 7) I do have an HD Radio, and the only thing I can say is it does make identifying DX stations a lot easier, but the benefits don't outweigh the reason to have an HD Radio in the first place. There just isn't much new content to really care.
- 8) I've only heard DRM and HD Radio and between the two, I like how DRM sounds. AM Stereo (if it hadn't have died) would have helped AM here in the states a great bit. HD Radio just doesn't make sense on AM, but FM its "just okay," nothing spectacular. I prefer analog in the long run.
If there is a way, I would encourage you to tell the Egypt government not to accept HD Radio (Ibiquity) should they choose to select a digital system. I'd let them know to go with DRM or the better equivalent. Hope this helps! --milonica (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Milonica. Your reply couldn't be more helpful :) I also suspected the bizarre propagandist claims that digital radio is supposed to achieve. It doesn't seem sane that 100 kbps (even in AAC+) would do better than the analog stereo FM. It should be not less than 192 kbps to really feel persuaded to migrate to digital. Not to mention the poorer range.
- Most probably if a digital radio broadcasting system would be used in Egypt, it would not be in the near future & would be the same as used in Europe, because that site [1] claims that Egypt is planning to use DVB/T the same system used in Europe, so I suppose that if digital radio would be used in the far future in Egypt, the European standard would be used. Just as 625 lines was (SECAM, then migrating to PAL in 1992) chosen as the standard for analog TV, as in Europe. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 08:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hmm...
Hello, What are you exactly talking about ? :D Nima1024 (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- The edits to the radio stations using AWB. They popped up on my watch list because I had just created those articles earlier.--milonica (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Aha, that's nice, have fun ;) Nima1024 (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- The edits to the radio stations using AWB. They popped up on my watch list because I had just created those articles earlier.--milonica (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of KNSP, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.kwadknsp.com.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 04:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome to the project, --Kumioko (talk) 04:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Glad to help! --milonica (talk) 04:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Please provide input
Your recently provided input at Talk:WAPS_(FM)#Requested_move. I have requested a similar move for article WNIR (FM). Please provide input at Talk:WNIR_(FM)#Requested_move. Blcklght8 (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)