User talk:Mikipedia111

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dick Armey, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu

Thanks for informing me i was unaware. Mikipedia111 (talk) 22:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Bluethricecreamman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 18:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grooming gang moral panic in the United Kingdom. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Mikipedia111, you may be blocked from editing. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Grooming gang moral panic in the United Kingdom and Talk:Grooming gang moral panic in the United Kingdom) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]