User talk:MikeyMagdalene

August 2023

Hello, I'm Novo Tape. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ætla have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 17:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Novo Tape. I'm sad to hear that, I'm fairly new to writing pages on Wikipedia and have done some fun things in my sandbox. I would love to hear how I can make my edits more constructive.

Greetings, Mikey. MikeyMagdalene (talk) 18:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm happy to help. This edit was reverted by me since it's a non sequitur and is written in non-neutral language.

The other edit I reverted contained the text "Not much is known about Ætla's early life. Annals suggest that he did not live for very long. Before becoming bishop he was a monk in the Northumbrian Monastery of Whitby."

There's nothing wrong with this text itself, but it does look like a copyright violation (i.e. the text was copied from somewhere else word for word). Additionally, you didn't cite a source.

I see that in this edit (reverted by someone else) you added a source but did not provide a page.

If you wish to re-add the info, please make sure it is not copied from any other text, is cited properly with a page number, and that it doesn't contain irrelevant statements. For help on citing sources, see WP:CITE. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 23:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Esteemed Novo Team,

You're telling me it is non sequitur, I don't know where you got that from since it clearly states what he was doing before his bishopric was ordained.

With the citing, I had made a mistake.

I have received this information from David Peter Kirby's The Saxon bishops of Leicester, Lindsey (Syddensis ), and Dorchester, here it states "Bede records that Aetla had been a monk of the Northumbrian monastery of Whitby (Hist. Eccles. IV, 23)."

This is also sequitur, and I do not know how you have come to the conclusion of this being "non-neutral language" since it does not contain any opinions of D.P Kirby himself and is a fact stated by a trustworthy monk of the Anglo-Saxon period.

Best regards, Mikey. MikeyMagdalene (talk) 12:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edit I dubbed a non sequitur contained the following:

==M.G==

M.G is super cool.

For obvious reasons, I'm not quite sure how this relates to the article, and I never stated that your other edit is a non sequitur/non-neutral, only this one. The phrase "super cool" is non-neutral for obvious reasons. Apologies for any confusion and you're free to re-add the other statement with the source (which I notice you did). Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 17:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This I have done out of spite due to you not even closely correcting me but only saying it is non sequitur. This does not at all help.

Goodbye, I am hereby ending this dispute because I do not want to continue this childish debate.

Greetings, Mikey. MikeyMagdalene (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.G. Maxwell-Stewart moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to P.G. Maxwell-Stewart. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

👍 MikeyMagdalene (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.G. Maxwell-Stewart (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P.G. Maxwell-Stewart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeyMagdalene! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.G. Maxwell-Stewart (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NAUTHOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P.G. Maxwell-Stewart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Earliest English Kings moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Earliest English Kings. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (talk) 13:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about David Peter Kirby

Hello MikeyMagdalene, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, David Peter Kirby, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Peter Kirby.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pickersgill-Cunliffe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:P.G. Maxwell-Stewart

Hello, MikeyMagdalene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:P.G. Maxwell-Stewart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jimmy Ellis

Hello, MikeyMagdalene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jimmy Ellis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Earliest English Kings

Hello, MikeyMagdalene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Earliest English Kings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]