Jump to content

User talk:Mikeowat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your draft article, Draft:Codaye Tech

[edit]

Hello, Mikeowat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Codaye Tech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paystack

[edit]

Hello, Mikeowat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paystack".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palton Morgan Holdings (June 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lord Bolingbroke was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mikeowat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Palton Morgan Holdings

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Palton Morgan Holdings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JavaHurricane 15:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Mikeowat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palton Morgan Holdings (June 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adeyinka Adesope for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adeyinka Adesope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeyinka Adesope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 18:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed Paid

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Mikeowat. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Adeyinka Adesope, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mikeowat. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mikeowat|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 18:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was neither paid nor compensated

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your contribution. I have not been paid or compensated whether directly or indirectly for my article. I have compiled this, using online resources and there will be no future compensation whatsover. Owatunde Michael D. 19:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Mikeowat, a quick observation of your edit history proves otherwise. I can only help you understand things better if you are completely honest, now have you ever worked for Property Mart? Have you had any business directly or indirectly with the subject of your article? Edit for pay isn’t forbidden, frowned on? A little! but not forbidden in so far as you make it public knowledge as per WP:PAID & also see WP:COI. Celestina007 (talk) 19:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Celestina007, Yes I worked for Propertymart and i know a bit of him in person. He recently celebrated his 42 years birthday, which was posted on many social media pages. The truth of the matter is that I have not been paid to write or make edits for him. And if i may ask, am i supposed to write about things and people i don't know? For example, i had written about Codaye and Paystack at some point, but the articles were deleted. These are companies popular in Nigeria, but weren't on Wikipedia at those times. I didn't even know where their companies are let alone visiting, yet it was deleted. So, let me ask again, what am i supposed to write or bring to Wikipedia, what i have no knowledge of?Owatunde Michael D. 19:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mikeowat, Then that means you have a WP:COI with your articles subject. Although it’s somthing I personally frown upon but you may indeed write about the company you work for in so far as you declare your WP:COI. And yes writing about something or someone you don’t know personally is the norm of this collaborative project as opposed to writing for someone or an organization you are related to. Feel free to ask me other questions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mikeowat: you have continued to edit - which is fine - but have not made the required disclosures on your talk page. Please make them ASAP - I will link WP:PAID again for your convenience. Thanks. SamHolt6 (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SamHolt6: Thanks for reaching out. Please check my user page, I think I have been able to declare WP:COI, I hope I did it correctly. If however, I didn't, I will appreciate if you can help. If not, kindly go ahead and delete the page and article. I will say it again, there is no benefit or compensation of any kindly for this page and article or any other one i have created so far. Thanks. Owatunde Michael D. 15:52, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
@Mikeowat: it's a good start, but a disclosure needs to be done for every relevant article. Do you have a paid connection to Palton Morgan? SamHolt6 (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

CentrespreadGrey moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, CentrespreadGrey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 22:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Palton Morgan Holdings

[edit]

Hello, Mikeowat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palton Morgan Holdings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CentrespreadGrey

[edit]

Hello, Mikeowat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CentrespreadGrey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mikeowat&oldid=1043821945"