User talk:MikeWatt

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, MikeWatt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 17:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits too Mike Watt (writer)

Hello. If you are the same Mike Watt that is referenced in Mike Watt (writer), please be extremely careful when editing this article to avoid problems with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. WP:AUTO and WP:COI give some good tips and suggestions for how to approach this situation. Also, please note that using alternate accounts to avoid this guideline is generally against Wiki policy. Please let me know if you have any questions, and happy editing. --Nsevs • Talk 18:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief, it never even occurred to me that this would be against bylaws. I'm very sorry if this screwed anything up. I won't touch the entry written about me from here on out.--(MikeWatt (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/ArchieHall for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Nsevs • Talk 11:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you are using sockpuppets

You are new around here, that's why you can't figure out why you were caught. You are using sockpuppets, or having your friends do so. It is obvious to anyone that reviews the case. You can stop pretending now. It's a waste of our time watching you play this game. Take responsibility since no one is buying your song and dance. Moving forward, please edit constructively.Tromatical (talk) 22:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

serious legal action

Your blog indicates that you might believe that all this is due to a recurring problem that involves legal action. If so, you might want to contact Wikipedia here by email (confidentally) to explain. They might be able to help you out. Nsevs • Talk 01:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. MikeWatt (talk) 11:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NO personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

>> You are engaging in personal attacks with other editors. >> Looked into the sockpuppet case against you at your request. >> Evidence points to abuse of multiple accounts, used to attack other contributors. Will move to block account if behavior continues. Fearedhallmonitor (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the edit referenced is [1], as Fearedhallmonitor said here. --Nsevs • Talk 17:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh for... this is the same guy. Fearedhallmonitor was a suspected sockpuppet of Tromaintern, who was a suspected sockpuppet of Ogabadaga. Poyoylar and Tromatic are the same person, as evidenced of their page creations... And all of this supports what I know about this person from Myspace and Film Threat. Okay, Nsevs, I really want to thank you for your time. I'll contact Wiki in private. MikeWatt (talk) 20:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do that. You and I both know I don't care if my account, or other's peoples accounts, get banned or deleted. All I care about is that your self-promoting articles were reported. And the process for inevitably deleting those phony articles is intact. That will happen (i.e.those articles will get erased). And that's the only concern here: protecting wikipedia against your attempts to blantantly advertise your ego for financial gain. So waste all the time you want. I've done my job and I am content. Good luck with life's endevours and try not to worry so much about what people think about you all the time. You are a critic, right? So you of all people should know that having a tough skin in this industry is required. That's the beauty of the 1st Amendment. Have nice day and sorry that your articles will be deleted. Take care.Poyoyloar (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proof

k, now I KNOW you are lying, or seriously misinformed. I read your blog, Mike. I have also contacted a couple of the people on your myspace list about your original attempt to blantantly advertize on wiki. In the process of speaking with them, I discovered the following: I have no doubt you have your distractors. But whoever it is bothering you, this much I do know: You originally thought he/she was a person named Krist, then you thought it was a person named Stephen, then you thought it was a person Lojjas, then you thought it was a person named Dan. Sounds like a few people are bothering you, or jumping in to bother you when are other are. Or maybe, or whoever it is bothering you has probably done a pretty good job hiding his real identity, as do alot of anonymous users online. But whatever slip up, or proof, you think you have is probably set up in a way to throw you off that person's trail.

But we can clear this up easily. I have a webcam, a telephone number, both of which are opportunities for you to see who I am and where I am since my IP address and phone number should establish those credentials at point of communication. I offer to do this if that helps you resolve this for your peace of mind. After that conversation with me, you should pretty much figure out who I am, which is probably not the person you think I am. I never said that I haven't criticised you elsewhere on the internet. Yes, I've certainly criticized your amateur movies and your amateur journalism elsewhere online. But as for this notion that I accused you of a crime, which is a serious deal, I still fail to see where you provided a link to this alleged event. My advice is this: if you are this sure, then simply post a blog naming this person, his social security number, his location, and his phone number. Then get a restraining order against that person. Shouldn't be that hard if you know who is this person. Otherwise, you are beating yourself up over nothing.

In the meanwhile, I'll send you my contact info to your myspace page so you can begin the process of getting to know me. Nobody, including me, want to see you or your wife be accused of crimes if that was your fear in this all along. Hope I can help. Take care.

Sincerely,

Xiang

Poyoyloar (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Your Mike Watt article was deleted because it was detirmined by a consensus that the subject of the article was not notable enough to be included in the encyclopedic canon of notable writers/journalists. However we are working on a way to improve your Amy Lynn Best article so it will not be deleted. As always, thx for your contributions.Poyoyloar (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]