User talk:Mike-Jones-at-dc

Welcome!

Hello, Mike-Jones-at-dc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like User:Mike-Jones-at-dc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mike-Jones-at-dc

A tag has been placed on User:Mike-Jones-at-dc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of User:Mike-Jones-at-dc and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Mike-Jones-at-dc|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article User:Mike-Jones-at-dc

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at User:Mike-Jones-at-dc. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create attack pages. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bluewater, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bluewater was changed by Mike-Jones-at-dc (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-12T17:37:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Cirt (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike-Jones-at-dc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

drake circus is more than just a shopping mall - its a unique shopping experience and as Webhamster is forced to point out it is not a playground for university trolls to publish their academic rubbish - it is for the benefit of users and we are pleased that some of you have given our article and link the protection it deserves.Mike-Jones-at-dc (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request makes no sense and does not address the reason for your block. See WP:GAB. — Sandstein 18:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.