User talk:Mikac5

This is Mikac5's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanko Kristl (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanko Kristl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikac5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your help- I don't understand why my article was rejected. I've referenced the Slovenian national press agency (STA), a daily newspaper Delo (neutral source), I've cited yn article poublishe by a national museum for architecture and design and slovene natioanl academy of science and art (the higest national institute). I've writen an article on Slovene architect that I do not know... so I don't understand. Please help. Mikac5 (talk) 14:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I declined (not 'rejected') this draft for two reasons:

Referencing: most of the contents are not referenced; there are ten paragraphs, of which six are entirely unsupported. As the subject died very recently, they still come under our rules governing articles on living people (see WP:BLP), which require every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal and family details to be clearly supported with inline citations to reliable published sources. To give you an idea, I would expect to see probably 20+ citations in an article this size; yours has four.
Notability: for notability per WP:GNG, we need to see significant coverage of the subject, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. Sources 1 and 3 are primary, so they don't count. Source 4 is borderline, as it isn't very extensive. Source 2 is solid, but it alone isn't enough, as we normally require 3+ sources, and even together with the borderline 4, these aren't enough; you would need to add at least one more source that squarely meets the GNG standard.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanko Kristl (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanko Kristl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stanko Kristl

Hello, Mikac5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stanko Kristl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]