User talk:Miguel raul

Welcome!

Hello, Miguel raul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse Q&A forum, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Xeltran (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to the Teahouse!

Hello! Miguel raul, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 04:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thanks for all your image work on Wikipedia articles! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you recently passed 1,000 edits to Wikipedia, and I just wanted to recognize all the work you've done to enhance the use of photographs on Wikipedia. Cheers, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Keep up the good work. :) ---North wiki (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm DAJF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fukuoka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 07:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Filipino American#Change made without consensus

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Filipino American#Change made without consensus. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edits

Hey there! What are your reasons for reverting my edits in Manila? You even remove a vital part of it on the Arts and Culture. Would you mind if I change the picture on Manila's header? It's so noisy. --PH 0447 (talk) 10:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping the Global Economy

Hi Miguel, I am looking for volunteers to re-create the link below for all 196 countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States The goal of this project is to map out the global economy. Here is the project page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_Economic_Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnabber091 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manila:Economy

Regarding "The plan to make the Chinatown area into a BPO hub is being pursued (not championed) by the city government of Manila." I had consulted the source prior to my edit. I'll concede your reversion but my edit was just to substitute a softer word since a government (any) can only promote and make available an area for private enterprise to truly develop. It was a slight semantic nod to private enterprise instead of making it seem as if only government action mattered. While incentives and accessibility are important, government efforts can only go so far.

In any event, thanks for the regression. --andyJSD 14:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajsdecepida (talk • contribs)

The Necessity of expanding

The old version of the article did not even mention the formation of the 1st Republic, the dissolution of Mexico or the rise of the Illustrado class, central to every Philippine textbook. I also feel that the British Occupation deserves a space of it's own rather than being subsumed under Spanish Period because important events like Diego Silang's Revolt happened precisely because the British invaded. Furthermore, the expanded version underscores the fact that Mexican influence via New Spain is different than the Spanish influence which happened directly. Let's discuss the merits and demerits of this expansion. :D

Truly Yours.

Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagalog help needed

Hello Miguel, I'm contacting you because we need some Tagalog translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Tagalog Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why Manila is the world's first Global City

According to the book entitled, The Prize of All the Oceans. by Williams, Glyn published by Viking, New York. ISBN 0-670-89197-5, p. 4. It is stated that Manila is being fought over by many world empires and one can deduce even from on'es common sense that Manila is the worlds' first global city because the Manila Galleons marked the first time trade truly became global, wherein goods from the Western Hemisphere (The old world and the Americas) where traded for goods from the Eastern hemisphere (Asia) as what exactly happened during the Manila Galleons. It did not happen before the Manila Galleons era but it happened after it. Yet, this fundamental fact is put under the table. Why can't people just accept the truth? I cannot allow people to denigrate and remove this honor from a the City who holds this title originally. It is the city of our affections, the city which almost all great empires tried to fight over and then you come waltzing in and say oh! It's just a beta global city? Lol it's the original global city. Thank You.

Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 12:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I am not the one who removed the statement "world's first global city". Thank you. Miguel raul 09:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article sections based on main articles

See WP:SUMMARY. Dougweller (talk) 05:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NLEX Road Warriors Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NLEX Road Warriors Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jollibee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dong Nai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bakhawan Eco-Park

Hello Miguel, and nice to meet you. Im the one who took the pictures at Bakhawan Eco-Park in Kalibo you have used in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakhawan_Eco-Park I am also the one who wrote the italian WP article about the park https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco_Parco_di_Bakhawan I only would like to drive your attention to this article http://news.pia.gov.ph/index.php?article=961389776786 which might be useful to improve your article. Hi from Italy and wish you a nice day.Paolobon140 (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, I'll work on it. By the way, thanks for informing me.. :) Miguel raul 1:47, 10 May 2014 (PST)

Orphaned non-free image File:SM City North EDSA Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SM City North EDSA Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tourism in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

], [[Malaybalay]], [[Maria Cristina Falls]], [[Mati, Davao Oriental|Mati]], [Mount Kalatungan]], [[Mount Malindang]], [[Tinuy-an Falls]], [[Mount Apo]], [[Misamis Occidental Aquamarine Park]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Manila into Manila. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SM Megamall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDSA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quezon City, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alicia and La Trinidad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caloocan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDSA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of the Philippines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Geographic and San Agustin Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Miguel raul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Miguel raul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Miguel raul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]