Jump to content

User talk:Michigangirl111

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sundayclose. Your recent edit to the page Anorexia nervosa appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 16:54, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

[edit]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Please don't remove old discussions from Talk pages. They're an archive of things that people have discussed and decided in the past, and are better left in place. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 18:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Can you please take it down ?

michigangirl11 18:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, in addition to what John said, the basic rule is that you shouldn't remove others' messages without their permission. I know you posted the original message but you're deleting my reply as well. I'd be fine with it, but I feel there's no reason to remove it. Unless what I said is incorrect, in which case I'd imagine I would have been rebutted by now. Lizard (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I started it and I really want it removed. Please it's for personal reasons. I am having trouble with stalker issues and I don't want someone knowing who I am! Please!!!!!!

It will get archived in a week or two anyway. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Michigangirl111: Please read Wikipedia:Revision deletion, as that appears to the most appropriate method for you to permanently remove the content originally posted by your account. As your blanking of this content seven times has been reverted each time, it should be clear that this method will not achieve your stated goal. UW Dawgs (talk) 01:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Is there a reason u won't allow me to take this down? It's really not fair? What is this benefiting u by being on ur page? It's just a stupid request? Really? Wow. Can I at least delete my comment? And delete names out? U keep reporting me too! Seriously!

March 2016

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


So it's against rules to delete my OWN comments too on someone else's page? This is CRAZY!