User talk:Michael lone2004

~ I Care

Let's work together to get Blank Banshee included in Wikipedia

It looks like we have independently created and proposed articles for Blank Banshee, and I feel it is almost guaranteed my article in its current state will get declined the same as yours and the other attempt. I propose we join forces and attempt to create an article that will pass the Wikipedia standards. At this point, it might be pretty challenging, as there are very few media references to Blank Banshee. However, I personally feel that because Blank Banshee was so formative to the genre of vaporwave and is mentioned as so on vaporwave's main wiki page, it is silly not to include Blank Banshee in Wikipedia. We may have to wait for additional press converage to have enough references to get an article accepted. Here is a link to my article in its current state:| Blank_Banshee_3. Nicememay (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)nicememay[reply]

Hey there. I just noticed this now and yes I agree I've been trying for a while. I believe Blank Banshee is worthy of an article at this point but there were some issues with trolling and previous articles created by other users. he's become somewhat red flagged as a topic now but as a huge fan of his work I believe it's only a matter of time. Your article is good too, I tried to chop mine down to the facts. Michael lone2004 (talk) 10:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blank Banshee (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blank Banshee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Michael lone2004, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Blank Banshee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Blank Banshee. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Blank Banshee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Blank Banshee. Thanks! NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blank Banshee (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Consensus on draft's talk page is that it is not notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blank Banshee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 00:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Blank Banshee

A tag has been placed on Draft:Blank Banshee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not very notable and looks like this article was made as a joke

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Plum3600 (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Blank Banshee concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blank Banshee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Blank Banshee concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blank Banshee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Blank Banshee concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blank Banshee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Blank Banshee concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blank Banshee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blank Banshee

Hello, Michael lone2004. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blank Banshee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Patrick Driscoll

Hello, Michael lone2004. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrick Driscoll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 12:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]