User talk:Michael A Anthony PE

Welcome!

Hello, Michael A Anthony PE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Leading practice discovery, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leading practice discovery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminders of Good Editing Practice

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 12:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Stephenb (Talk) 12:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Michael A Anthony PE, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Flat Out let's discuss it 10:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Flat Out. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Leading practice discovery, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 10:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research to articles as you apparently did to Education facilities industry. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leading practice discovery

The article Leading practice discovery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No inline citations to verify any of the content. Original Research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Education facilities industry

The article Education facilities industry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no inline citations to verify content, original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Leading practice discovery, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Education facilities industry, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Education facilities industry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Education facilities industry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education facilities industry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out let's discuss it 22:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leading practice discovery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading practice discovery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading practice discovery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out let's discuss it 22:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles up for deletion

You really have to address the issues that have been raised about your two articles. Otherwise they will likely be deleted. The deletion discussions have not had any support (including by you) for these articles. Meters (talk) 00:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know that it is possible to argue against their deletion. Is this where I do it? Of course, I would like to see them stay. I do something every day, or every other day if anyone has noticed. There are huge gaps in what Wikipedia has on thie subject and I can only do so much at a time. My hope is to get both articles to the point where I can bring in others to edit. That's the plan. I will try to find out how to argue against deletion. I wouldn't mind a hint. Michael A Anthony PE (talk) 02:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've found your way to the discussions. I refactored your submission as a Keep since that is the standard. Meters (talk) 02:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]