User talk:Mhubbe2/sandbox
BCarmichael feedback
[edit]The sections added are incorporated well within the existing content. More specifics could be provided. Based on the Wildlife section, is this area considered to have a high biodiversity? Are there particular species that tend to only occur here? What types of natural disturbances are expected? Were there specific ant species to which you could link to WP articles? Such additions would enhance the article. References are appropriate, though I recommend another source than Encyclopedia Britannica for the same reasons that we do not cite Wikipedia. Also the peer-reviewed science article is great, but format the citation so it goes to the journal rather than JSTOR. Overall, your edits are working to strengthen this article! BCarmichael (talk) 21:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
kralph1 feedback
[edit]The first sentense that you added under "Formation" makes sense, but would be more clear if you included some of the "typical characteristics" that you discussed. Additionally, add an a in your phrase "After the initial formation, a post-tropical cyclone". Ending the contribution under that section discussing occulusion, you could link it to this wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occluded_front. I don't know how to do it on this page but if you would like to make that change I can show you how to do it in your sandbox. Good job!! kralph1 talk 12:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
kkearn7 feedback on 1997 Red River Flood
[edit]The information added is interesting and informative. It doesn't have much to do with the disturbance itself, but it is relevant to societal response, which is an important aspect of natural disturbances. Also, it is very well-phrased and well-cited. More specifics about catastroffiti in the 1997 Red River Flood could have been helpful, but overall it's relevant material. Nice job identifying missing citations, too. Kkearn7 (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)