Jump to content

User talk:Mgoldenbarnes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannes Bieger (February 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mgoldenbarnes! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mgoldenbarnes! You created a thread called Hannes Bieger Wiki page declined at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannes Bieger (April 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 05:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nic Fanciulli (August 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aman.kumar.goel was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 11:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mgoldenbarnes! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wondering what else I can do to get my page accepted?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nic Fanciulli has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nic Fanciulli. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nic Fanciulli has been accepted

[edit]
Nic Fanciulli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creepTalk 15:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Argy DJ

[edit]

Hello Mgoldenbarnes, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Argy DJ, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argy DJ.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bobby Cohn}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]