User talk:MgCupcake

Evaglow has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Lance Bass

Heya, shame about that FAC. You planning to nominate it again (say yes :D)? You might want to find a copyeditor beforehand though - that's nearly always a sticking point. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison and Dumenco

Harrison and Dumenco are no longer together: http://www.afterelton.com/people/2008/11/gaycelebrityboyfriends2?page=0%2C2 (After Elton) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.200.131 (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A smile

~Itzjustdrama ^{C ?} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=) Thanks for the bit of help on St. Francis Preparatory School today.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'd love to help! I agree with you on that. The introduction needs sources and I'm sure the clubs are a copyvio. I'm currently working on citing the notable alumni section and I plan on taking a photo of the existing building sometime soon. ~Itzjustdrama ^{C ?} 04:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting phony links

On January 12, via this edit [[1]], you fraudulently inserted a link to a spamsite hosting disruptive malware but identified it as a link to a legitimate news article. This is serious vandalism. If you do this again, or if you have done this on other occasions, you should expect your editing privileges to be suspended or revoked. The matter is being reported for administrative review. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I defended you on that section...this warning was out of line and I am certain you never intended nothing more to source an item within the article. If someone placed malware on that site, it's clearly not your fault and I feel that HW did not assume good faith with you at all. My apologies if this was discouraging to you. Nate • (chatter) 00:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You put in links to a spamsite and claimed they were links to a legitimate source. That's never appropriate. Even if you hadn't intended to deceive anybody, 1)you should know that sites like that pose hazards to users (my antimalware software reported a stream of tracking cookies and other stuff coming from that site that does nothing but bad stuff to any legitimate user), and 2) the link violated multiple other Wikipedia policies/guidelines, like WP:LINKVIO and WP:CITE#SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT. It's also a site that requires registration, which is generally frowned on, since so many of such ssites (there are, of course, recognized exceptions) exist to harvest email addresses for sale to spammers. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. We're dealing with the wrath (and excessive free time) of Hullaballoo, folks. Of COURSE he violated WP:AGF! The guy violates WP:AGF, WP:Wikilawyering, WP:3RR, WP:WIKIHOUNDING, etc. each and every day. In reality he is a rather stalker-eque homophobe who spends hours on end vandalizing other editors' work and then hiding behind deliberately misinterpreted "rules" to defend himself. You can't stop him; he has nothing to do with his time but continue to serially vandalize any and every article that you contribute to, many times per minute, all day every day at his "local library," if he decides he doesn't like you (particularly if you identify yourself as gay or gay-friendly). He has never made a single constructive edit to Wikipedia; only destructive ones. No matter how many times his vandalism is reverted, he just keeps it up. A number of editors are slowly amassing evidence against him in the hopes that the admins will re-instate the earlier ban against him; but in general, the admins have demonstrated that they just don't care, and always try to pass off the reports of his behavior to some other admin board. Nobody wants to deal with him. Feel free to discuss on my talk page. Don't try to bring anything up on his; he will instantaneously erase it and call you "disruptive" or say you're "harassing" him. He loves to play victim. Cubert (talk)

01:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

There's quite a few of us having issues with Hullaballo. Feel free to check out my talk page as well. You may become a target because of your interest in LGBT studies. = ( Swancookie (talk) 16:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Christie (murderer)

Hello there. I've requested a peer review for the article on John Christie (murderer) and I'm looking for feedback from people interested in serial killers. John Christie was a British serial killer from the 1940s and 50s who murdered a number of women but was also controversially involved in another murder trial, where he gave what's now considered perjured evidence against a fellow tenant. The case generated a lot of controversy in the UK. I'm hoping to turn the article into a featured article, so I'm looking for any comments about potential problems or if there's anything that needs improving. The peer review is available here. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

Wcp07 (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Otlstill.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Otlstill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Outofsync.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Outofsync.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicelebs.com as a source

Hi XXXXXX. I noticed that you recently used ethnicelebs.com as a source for biographical information in Jonathan Groff. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 20:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spring Awakening: Those You've Known moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spring Awakening: Those You've Known, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 19:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Groff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merrily We Roll Along. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spring Awakening: Those You've Known

Hello, MgCupcake. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spring Awakening: Those You've Known, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spring Awakening: Those You've Known

Hello, MgCupcake. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spring Awakening: Those You've Known".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]