User talk:Mfox100

Mfox100, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Mfox100!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Louis Fox (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is ap omotional press release. WP does not do that. He might possibly be notable as an author--this requires references to substantial reviews of his books from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Louis Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Louis Fox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mfox100! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Louis Fox (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Willsome429 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please change fluffy sections to more of a neutral tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Louis Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Louis Fox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Michael Louis Fox concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Michael Louis Fox, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Louis Fox

Hello, Mfox100. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Louis Fox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Mfox100/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Mfox100/sandbox. Thanks! ~Liance^talk 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mark Fox, from its old location at User:Mfox100/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 18:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 18:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No this is not an autobiographical article. This is an article about my father, a retired federal judge. Other federal judges have pages, and his service warrants one, as well. All sources are third-party and legitimate. Please undelete the article, and return it to consideration as a Wikipedia article page. Thank you. Mfox100 (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Fox (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I disagree with you completely. The sources cited are legitimate, independent sources. No different from those noted in many other articles I reviewed. The tone and structure exactly matches those of other articles I reviewed. This is not an autobiographical article. Again, I wish for this article to be reconsidered by a different reviewer and accepted for Wikipedia posting. This is a bio of a former judge. You have other bios on Wikipedia, and his service warrants listing, as well. Mfox100 (talk) 22:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was declined per the reason in the decline box. It's certain for editors to disagree with the reviewing. I will advise that you improve the draft before resubmitting or seek help even. Also try to maintain civility by sorting it out with another editor (can be the reviewer/help desk). Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In writing this non-autobiographical article, citations are made to newspapers, law journals, law society documents, bar association documents, court documents, and other similar sources. What other sources could be better or more accurate?

As far as the tone and structure, I mirrored other articles. How could the tone of this article not be acceptable or match Wikipedia standards?

And, this is not an article written by the subject. Thus, no issue of one writing about themselves.

I believe this addresses all of the issues. How can the article be re-reviewed? Thank you. Mfox100 (talk) 22:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]