User talk:mfaith1

Please add your comment in a new section by clicking here. Thanks. –m.f ^{(T • C)}

Template:Cover Art Image

FYI, there are already two templates for comicbook covers. {{comiccover}} and {{promocomic}} --DrBat 00:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thunderbolts

Concerning some of your edits; adding "Re-launch (New creative team)" is redundant. This isn't the first relaunch or new creative team T-Bolts has had, and all of the info fell under the previous section 'Faith in Monsters' anyway.

As for the image; images are usually used only once per article, and I thought the promotional art was just of a better quality (compare this and this).

Anyway, I'm sorry if I came off as rude anywhere. --DrBat 03:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Gaiman article

Thank you for making that change, in order to draw attention to the state of the Gaiman article. I have just recently begun to watch this article, and have discovered all of the unsourced material. I was not sure how to go about bringing such attention to it. Thanks again. –m.f ^{(t • c)} 10:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem — I really just moved the template a bit higher up. Honestly, a lot of the article looks like it's in decent shape — some fact-checking would certainly be nice, of course, but it's a good bit of writing to work from. But delving into a "legal battle" without sourcing ... well, that just makes me a bit uneasy. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 10:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template cleanup

A few templates you created, Template:Cover Art Image and Template:Marvel Cover Art Image Description, have been marked for deletion as deprecated and orphaned templates. If, after 14 days, there have been no objections, the templates will be deleted. If you wish to object to their deletion, please list your objections here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the templates. If you feel the deletions are appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 16:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

Good work copyediting the Bleach summaries. I like how they are ending.Tintor2 (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Gantz chapters/archive1. It has a good answer though it gives some recommendations. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, those was definitely good feedback. The only thing I would have issue with is the need to explain tankobon. A simple wikilink would solve that. Otherwise all of those other suggestions are pretty accurate and relatively easy to fix. I can't get to it right now, but I think they need to be addressed. Thanks! --–m.f ^{(t • c)} 17:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That of the tankobon is easy to fix. We only turn it to "tankobon volume" or "tankobon volume format" and then we keep using volume.Tintor2 (talk) 18:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan to also nominate the Gantz volumes? Though the peer review first needs to ends.Tintor2 (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the reason for the peer review was to ready the list for FL qualification.----–m.f ^{(t • c)} 16:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I ll see if I can work in the Fullmetal Alchemist manga chapters.Tintor2 (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finished the Fullmetal Alchemist manga summaries.Tintor2 (talk) 01:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Manga and Anime BarnSakura Award
		For your excellent work with List of Gantz chapters (Now FL) and other chapters lists, I give this Sakura award. Congratulations

Tintor2 (talk) 00:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you could have a look at Bleach chapters? It seems it has a few grammar mistakes according to the PR. I think I made some of them while trimming it.Tintor2 (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the first volumes. The ones from the peer review said that some parts need fixing. The lead is okay now. The Copyedit tag was just added to attract more attention, but if you see that some parts are fixed, you can remove it.Tintor2 (talk) 14:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ll return home today or tommorrow. Could you have a look in the list of bleach chapters?Tintor2 (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to nominate the Bleach chapters list to FL, Im in holidays right now so I wont be able to help with comments from FLC.Tintor2 (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just check Wikipedia:Featured list candidates#Nomination procedure.Tintor2 (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kashimashi: Girl Meets Girl chapters

Hey, any chance you might have time to copyedit this list? It is on its second FLC, and looking like it may fail again because of the lack of copyedit (issue last time). The primary editor is trying, but its always hardest to CE your own work, you know? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lowercase

It appears you prefer your name stylized as "mfaith1". You can change the capitalization by adding {{lowercase}} anywhere on your page, and it will make it uncaps. moocowsrule 07:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Enough of this palavar.ogg)

Thanks for uploading File:Enough of this palavar.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mfaith1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reminder (Nearly album)

Hello Mfaith1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Reminder (Nearly album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mark^Dask 21:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NearLY reminder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NearLY reminder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mfaith1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]