Jump to content

User talk:MewMeowth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spam in LCPlayer

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on LCPlayer, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because LCPlayer is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting LCPlayer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Microsoft Word, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Microsoft Word was changed by Lprd2007 (u) (t) deleting 35639 characters on 2009-12-29T22:35:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Gh87 (talk) 06:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Gh87 (talk) 06:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Группа Винтаж.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Группа Винтаж.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Группа Винтаж.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Группа Винтаж.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Search in multiple applications at once on Windows Phone

[edit]

You say that Windows Phone can search at multiple applications at once (aka Universal Search). I do not see the feature and the references provided say it is not available. Could you explain why you say so? Maybe you can provide a better reference or video showing this feature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.137.175.250 (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Windows Phone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Verge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia Lumia 920, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BGR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nokia PureView

[edit]

The article Nokia PureView has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Written like an advertisement, not-notable enough to have it's own article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegoKontribsTalkM 05:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia Lumia 920, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WXGA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:58, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gawker

[edit]

You have added a POV template to Gawker. Please start a discussion on the talk page so that people understand what your concerns are. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia Lumia 920, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wired and O2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia Lumia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IPS and LTE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia Lumia 920, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BGR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AOpen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Microsoft's Newsletter: July 2013

[edit]

In this issue of the WikiProject Microsoft's Newsletter:

See the full edition at Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Outreach/Newsletter/July 2013! EdwardsBot (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to help WikiProject Microsoft from inactivity!

[edit]

Unfortunately, WikiProject Microsoft has become quite inactive, due to editors simply not taking part- remember a WikiProject relies on editors! So we'd thought we would remind you of ways to help and the rewards for doing so!

  1. Check the to-do list and actually do one of the tasks on it- for every task done, you will get a barnstar. It is enclosed at the bottom of this notification.
  2. Add our talk page to your watchlist.
  3. Contribute to our latest collaboration of the month- Zoo Tycoon (series)- all edits by members of WikiProject Microsoft will gain a barnstar!
To-do List

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

To unsubscribe from all newsletters, add your username to this list. Delivered to you by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs. Thanks. 188.245.55.175 (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cablevisión (Argentina), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages San Isidro and Vicente Lopez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, MewMeowth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MewMeowth. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MewMeowth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clarín-Frontpage-20151213.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:La-Nacion-Frontpage-19-October-2015.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La Anonima

[edit]

If this file has a {{PD-textlogo}} copyright tag, why shouldn't be uploaded to Commons ? What are you based on to affirm that it's not free in Argentina (country of origin)? in fact, this logo currently has another version in Commons. - Fma12 (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:La-Serenisima-Logo.svg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bagley-Logo.svg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bagley-Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grupo-Arcor-Logo.svg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Estanislao Fernández

[edit]

Hello MewMeowth, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Estanislao Fernández, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims coverage in reliable sources, might at the very least deserve a merge or redirect to notable father's entry but definitely not deletion. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 08:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important standard notices

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Neutralitytalk 23:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil conduct

[edit]

Please don't leave messages on my talk page with titles like "Gestapo" - I'm not sure what you intend to imply by that bizarre language, but it's not appreciated and violates the site policy on civility. Thanks, Neutralitytalk 23:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Neutralitytalk 23:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Your "Gestapo" remarks are reprehensible and unacceptable. Never do anything like that again. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MewMeowth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

While comparing another user to the Gestapo is considered a personal attack it was the only time I've ever done that (my second comment on Neutrality's talk page was an explanation of my original comment as the user had removed it from their talk page). The word Gestapo, while it understandably can evoke a number of emotions, was used in the adjective sense of the word in English meaning 'using the methods of the Gestapo.' As explained on my comment, I did not imply Neutrality was executing or torturing people and their response was in my opinion an overreaction, part of their bully-like tactics as displayed in their initial comment on my talk page. As per policy, only 'attacks that are particularly offensive or disruptive (such as physical threats, legal threats, or blatantly bigoted insults)' may be reported to ANI on 'first offenses and isolated incidents [clearly the case here.]' It seems to me that Neutrality's reaction and Cullen328's near-instant block were unwarranted and as administrators they should have a better understanding of the site policies.

It is important to note that the whole ordeal started after my first and only edit on Kayleigh McEnany's article (and on any U.S.-politics article for that matter) and it is the first time I've ever been brought up on ANI after 11 years and more than 1,000 edits on Wikipedia. The involved administrators' behaviour is especially worrisome considering it all stemmed from an edit on an article dealing with a contentious issue where both administrators seem to have vested interests in (Cullen328 is a self-declared Democrat and let's compare Neutrality's edit (after reverting mine) with EdJF's edit afterwards, an example of using encyclopedic language instead of using loaded words such as 'in fact,' 'indeed,' or 'repeatedly' all of which Neutrality was using.) The bully-like tactics of the involved administrators are extremely off-putting to other editors that are not usually involved in contentious articles and who like me, most of their contributions are simply an attempt to improve what I considered to be un-encyclopedic language on an article I simply stumbled upon on. MewMeowth (talk) 00:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:NOTTHEM. Also, I disagree that this block was unwarranted. If you want to go around comparing people to the Gestapo, perhaps you should stick to social media. English Wikipedia does not allow this kind of incivility. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will leave the decision about your block to another administrator. But I will note that you learned that I am a Democrat in the context of me stating on my user page that I had written a biography about a Republican, Norman Livermore, a close associate of Ronald Reagan, and that biography was quite favorable because Livermore was a person of integrity. I can state with 100% confidence that I would have blocked any editor of any political persuasion who made the type of reprehensible personal attack that you made. I have blocked nearly 2500 disruptive editors and you could study and parse all of my blocks and you would find no political bias whatsover. So, I advise you to conduct yourself differently in the future. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As an entirely uninvolved administrator (who lives in the UK and is not particularly interested in US politics), I would have done exactly what Cullen328 did, except I might have enacted a longer block. An editor put a couple of standard templates on your page - templates that explicitly say they are standard notifications and not accusations of wrongdoing. Sure, they're not exactly friendly barnstars, but to compare them with the actions of the Nazi secret police is not just offensive, it's also mind-blowingly inflated hyperbole. To do it once is out of line, but if you'd apologised and agreed not to do it again we wouldn't be here. When you refused to step away from it when challenged at ANI, you left admins with no choice but to block you. Don't blame anyone else for that - it's on you. I'd advise you to reflect on that. GirthSummit (blether) 13:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an admin, but maybe that's better because you won't feel I'm an abuse admin. You said at ANI "You left a notice stating I have shown interest in pseudo-science, which is absolutely not true." I had a quick look at Special:Contributions/MewMeowth and can see you edited Template:COVID-19 pandemic and created Li-Meng Yan. From the latter edit summary I see Yan is a virologist and also that you added her to to the template. I did see some mention of "whistleblower" but for the purpose of this comment, it's irrelevant. I likewise do not know or care about anything else about your edits. (I have not checked out the diffs.) The articles involved in the edits are enough to tell me that it was appropriate to give you an alert about the discretionary sanctions process for pseudo science and fringe science. As the alert specifically says, the appropriateness of your edits is also besides the point when it comes to giving these alerts. The alerts just let you know if the special care you need to take when editing such topics, and also allow you to be sanctioned if you do not take the necessary care. If you edits were already problem free, then you would have nothing to worry about. Again I do not know and do not care if that's the case for the purpose of these alerts. Nil Einne (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I should clarify I do not know why Neutrality gave you the alerts. My point was simply from checking your contribution history, it's trivial to see you are editing in an area where the pseudoscience and fringe science discretionary sanctions regime could apply, and therefore giving an alert was reasonable. Nil Einne (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Telecom-Argentina-Logo.svg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Telecom-Argentina-Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MewMeowth&oldid=1056657858"