User talk:Mervynbunique

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Mervynbunique (talk) 15:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Metro Manila 8.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Metro Manila 8.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Its deleted --Mervynbunique (talk) 11:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Gangs in the United States, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 21:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Gangs in the United States. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --Gnowor^T_C 22:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiping your records will not remove the records of your past vandalism as Wikipedia records all changes in its history including the content. Any internet user can simply undo your clearing via history. 112.210.241.195 (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to File:Ph seal quezon lucena.png, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Noom _talk ^contribs 19:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines national football team

What do you mean you can't spot the redundancy?

What you added at the intro:

In 2010, they qualified for the 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup, and went on to beat defending champions Vietnam during the group stage, becoming one of the biggest upsets in the history of the tournament. The team reached the knockout stage for the first time. In 2011, the Philippines first qualified for the group stage of the 2012 AFC Challenge Cup qualification. In the group stage, the Philippines qualified for the 2012 AFC Challenge Cup.

The last few sentences in the 'recent history section', which also includes your revision:

In 2010, they qualified for the 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup, and went on to beat defending champions Vietnam and making a draw with Singapore and Myanmar during the group stage, becoming one of the biggest upsets in the history of the tournament. The team reached the knockout stage for the first time, eventually losing to Indonesia 2–0 on aggregate. In 2011, the Philippines first qualified for the group stage of the 2012 AFC Challenge Cup qualification beating Mongolia 3-2 on aggregate. In the group stage, the Philippines qualified for the 2012 AFC Challenge Cup, becoming runner-up beating Bangladesh 3-0 and making a draw with Palestine and Myanmar.

The last couple of sentences in the 'recent history' section alone is also redundant. Banana Fingers (talk) 14:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skyline

I invite you to discuss matters regarding the selection of the skyline photos at Talk:Metro Manila#Skyline. You do not want yourself or any other user participating in an edit war regarding this matter, right? Discussing which skyline is best would settle the issue, and prevent unnecessary edits. Moray An Par (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SEABA Women's Basketball Championship

http://www.fibaasia.net/NewsDetails.aspx?id=262 Details of all the Women's Championships that have been removed for some reason. Mcruic (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

Please discuss this on talk to avoid further escalation. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Template:Largest cities of the Philippines shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Frietjes (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down

Hey, I know you don't like getting reverted here, but you need to calm down, as you are screaming, which is violating, WP:CIVIL. Might want to take this revert war to the talk page, because its getting out of hand. Mitch32^{(Never support those who think in the box)} 19:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down Version 2

Hi there, please can you discuss before you make a big deletion like you did, It has taken be days to compile the top 250 as opposed to the top 200 and I have been talking to many people on Skyscraper City who find it incredibly usefull to have a more complete list (They wanted me to edit it to Top 300 but I managed to talk them down!!!) I understand where you are coming from but at the end of the day it is only 50 more buildings and what with global construction as it is more and more landmark buildings were not being shown in the top 200, Im sorry for any inconviences this may cause ,

Please reply if you feel strongly about the list going from 200 to 250 buildings but please dont just delete days of my work,

thank you Guyb123321

ALSO please dont respond in all caps , it makes me very annoyed, lets keep this polite and civil OK, thank you Guyb123321 (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look if you really want we can take this to Dispute Resolution, But I think we can easily work this out our selves and as I saif there are many people who want me to do what I am doing (Some are wikipedia members most are not) I am trying to make wikipedia a better place, if you still really disagree about 50 buildings can we PLEASE just discuss it civilly, can you go to my talk page or something to acknoledge that you have got this thank you :-)Guyb123321 (talk) 20:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:City of MANILA SKYLINE.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:City of MANILA SKYLINE.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]