User talk:Merlisa12345

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Merlisa12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Merlisa12345 (talk) 4:25 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 20:55, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Merlisa12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason hereMerlisa12345 (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not here for things you made up one day. Talk page access revoked. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yeah yeah i heard it all before mate i dnt knw jack and you know everything so what i can i learn from you

You don't seem to understand the problem. If your account is blocked, you must not just set up another one - that is WP:Block evasion and WP:Sockpuppetry. Unblock requests will only be considered on the master account, SebastainTorres (talk), where you will have to convince the reviewing administrator that you understand why you were blocked and will not repeat that conduct. The reason you are blocked is that you are trying to use Wikipedia to write articles about some kind of game or fantasy competition based on Formula One racing, and you keep putting in articles like 2011 FIA Formula One Season, copied from real F1 articles but with all the drivers' names changed to names like "Natalie Everett" and "Chloe Chapman", who I guess are you and your friends. But Wikipedia is not a web-host for that kind of thing, it is an encyclopedia and its articles need to contain real facts, verifiable from reliable sources. Read WP:Verifiability and WP:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]