User talk:MerlinVtwelve/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:MerlinVtwelve. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Kalki Bhagavan

Vijaykumar a.k.a "Kalki Bhagavan" has never claimed himself as the title of "Kalki Bhagavan" himself; it was a name that stuck from Indian villagers around his headquartes; though he would migh take some advantage of this - as all gurus do - the Kalki_Bhagavan article has to be oriented that way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.97.51.170 (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Matthew. Deletion is not the way forward on this, (a) only a afd for the wrong reasons will find non-notable, and (b) rigorous BLP sourcing is best for all concerned - not least those who might fund this gentleman. However input from WP:BLP about the legal content of some newspaper articles cited might be advisable, I don't know myself. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't doubt it. As you'll see I restored the newspaper articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Mathew, was here (on this space between 05:37, 24 March 2013 - 07:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)) any piece of your conversation between (talk) ? Because his next edition seems to be a reply. I am curious to know the missing part here. Below is the continuation.

There is no part of the conversation missing as far as I can see. You can check the edit history of both pages. Also, please sign your posts. M Stone (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Sincere Apologies

Please see oops

Anyhow, the material is being composed offline for a different venue now.

Sorry about any inconveniences caused.

Mike

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.36.41 (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

sorry forgot to sign again

99.249.36.41 (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure, no worries, looks like I got caught in the crossfire... M Stone (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

clear things up

Hi Matthew, read your comment on my talk page.

It seems we started our WP relationship on a wrong foot, with both of us not having good faith on the other. Looking to clear things up and move forward. Now, response to your queries:

I am doing WP work on my personal interest and time. Had clarified earlier this to you here [[1]]
My opinion about Kalki Bhagavan is that he is a good human being and is helping people.
I do respect other view points. It is natural for each of us to have different ideas and views.
The conversation between In ictu oculi and myself, was about a conversation that I had deleted. The conversation was about a simple request I made to him to review the "biography" section that I had created. I then deleted the conversation, just due to my inexperience with WP protocols. As you may see, In ictu oculi is cool about it. We then had a separate discussion about some translation work he wanted help on.
The comments by user User: 177.158.129.70 , refer to my edits on the page Kalki Bhagavan. And I have no idea why this person used the word (again), as I do not remember him from earlier..

Let me know if you have any other query. Have a nice day Matthew. Prodigyhk (talk) 11:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

User Prodigyhk asked me at [[2]] if I am the same person that used other IP´s there. In order to keep a good WP:GF tone, I am signing that response here as well. 177.159.22.51 (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

177.159.22.51 okay, that's fine, it was not really an issue for me. M Stone (talk) 05:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

It seems you are going in circles. Let me repeat myself and make it clear to you

My relationship with the subject Kalki Bhagavan. As clearly stated in my above response is a person whom I respect as a good person who is helping people.
Have stated above "doing WP work on my personal interest and time". This means it is not my job nor has anyone instructed me to do this.
About the deleted conversation with In ictu oculi, since I am unable to satisfy you with my response, request you approach In Ictu directly and check if it was any major issue (or) a minor issue
About my lack of faith in you. From reading your comments on the talk page and edit history for the last 3 years, it is clear you hate the subject Kalki Bhagavan. Do you have any explanation for your hatred towards this person ?

Prodigyhk (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MerlinVtwelve. You have new messages at WLU's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Oneness University

What new information is there? If you want I can restore the page history. Giant Snowman 09:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

History of Oneness University restored. As it is currently a redirect, I suggest you create a new version of the article in your sandbox and we can review. Giant Snowman 10:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, taking a quick look, I cannot see any real independent notability, seperate from Kalki Bhagavan. Giant Snowman 09:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

You need to make that clearer then; you also need to properly cite your references. Giant Snowman 09:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kalki Bhagavan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Done

Done

Don't know what this is about. Please sign your posts. M Stone (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)