Jump to content

User talk:MeraAwaaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Banka district, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Mako001 (C)  (T) (The Alternate Mako) 07:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ang Pradesh (region)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ang Pradesh (region). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – [[:Anga]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Anga]]. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Anga|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. PQR01 (talk) 14:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that thank you MeraAwaaz (talk) 07:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ang Pradesh (region)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ang Pradesh (region) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anga area. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jakichandan (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bhagalpur division
added links pointing to Banka and Bangla
Bhagalpur
added a link pointing to English
Munger
added a link pointing to Maithili

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khagaria. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change remove sourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajjika, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maithili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why you are playing with Thethi Dialect

[edit]

I am a Thethi speaker from Khagaria and thethi does not have any connection with Angika dialect of Maithili so Can you tell me why you are making false and fake editing without any source or the other word why you are playing with Thethi Dialect of Maithili? Always remember Angika is not a language it's only a dialect of Maithili Chhika-Chhiki Varient. And Thethi is the Dialect of Maithili not Angika. (Dialect of Maithili language) And Stop your false editing without any source. Joy Mithilanchol Joy Sitaram. 103.208.55.139 (talk) 09:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a proud Angika speaker which is also known as Thethi Or Chhai - Chhu . What source you have to classify it as Maithili. Only maithils classify it as Dialect. I am not playing with it. Truth is also hard to digest. Always remember Angika is an Independent language which Government of Jharkhand has accepted as language and also included in Ssc exams. Jai Angika Jai Ang Pradesh Jai AngRaaj Karna Jai Maa Bishahari MeraAwaaz (talk) 07:45, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your effort for Angika (The Dialect of Maithili language) is useless or Waste

[edit]

Jakichandan or other editor will reverse your fake and False editing as soon as possible. Don't waste your time to edit Angika (The Dialect of Maithili) Chhika-Chhiki And for your kind information we are Thethi-Maithili speaker from Khagaria not an Angikan (Chhika-Chhiki) We don't use Chhika-Chhiki in our language. 43.230.107.69 (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i am back with another account MeraAwaaz (talk) 13:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Anga Jai Angika MeraAwaaz (talk) 23:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bhagalpur, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bajjika. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — B203GTB • (talk) • 17:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Angika. Jakichandan (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Angika shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — B203GTB • (talk) • 03:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nivedita Menon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STC1 talk 08:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Angika, you may be blocked from editing. — B203GTB • (talk) • 03:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Angika. Non-constructive edits, repeatedly adding duplicate sections.. – B203GTB  • (talk)  • 04:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MeraAwaaz reported by User:B203GTB (Result: ). Thank you. — B203GTB • (talk) • 02:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Angika

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 04:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

[edit]

Information icon - Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Jamui, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jamui, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, yesterday, that you should not add Indic script to our India-related articles - but are still doing so - please stop - Arjayay (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~TNT (talk • she/her) 10:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Proofrealhistory. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch™ 15:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MeraAwaaz. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
please unblock. I am sorry. It's more than a year MeraAwaaz (talk) 13:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Hi 2600:6C5E:547F:E56:B847:3DA8:2B33:9830 (talk) 01:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MeraAwaaz&oldid=1170158604"