User talk:MenoPorsche

LSBF lackey!! Have U no shame?!?! Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I noticed that you recently removed some content from London School of Business and Finance, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at London School of Business and Finance shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Hello I am userMenoPorsche. I would like to cite a conflict of interest in that I work for Global University Systems and noticed an error on the St Patricks College listing - Klaas Mierlo is not the Principle of the College - Professor Maurits van Rooijen should be listed as such. I would request a change to this listing.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Theroadislong (talk) 21:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at London School of Business, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 08:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MenoPorsche. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 08:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buchanan House, LSBF Professional School.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buchanan House, LSBF Professional School.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GISMA Business School

Besides the inappropriate language, eg " a British quality Sunday newspaper" and mentioning the fact that it was in the hard copy, the reason it was in the hard copy is that it was advertising. "Client: London School Of Business and Finance - placed by Bell Pottinger, an international public relations firm. Dougweller (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dougweller and thank you for your comments. This article was NOT advertising it was editorial that a PR agency placed by speaking to a journalist who liked what they heard and they wrote an editorial in The Sunday Times, widely recognized in the UK as a British quality Sunday newspaper as opposed to a tabloid gossip title - I hope that is clearer?

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to London School of Business and Finance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The application offers study material that is available for all to view, free of charge.<ref>[http://www.lsbf.org.uk/study_online/acca_online.html Study ACCA Online Courses - Distance Learning

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to subsidiaries of Global University Systems

The pattern of your edits and your comments here and here suggest that you are being paid (either directly or indirectly) for editing articles pertaining to Global University Systems and its subsidiaries. Undisclosed paid editing, regardless of the nature of the edits is prohibited by our policies. If you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MenoPorsche. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose. Please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure carefully and do not edit further until you answer this message. Voceditenore (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note your declaration on your user page what you work for Global University Systems [1]. I have added you as a connected contributor to all the talk pages of the articles you have edited. However, if your employment includes editing Wikipedia articles on the GUS subsidiaries and on GUS itself, then you are a paid editor and need to use the template {{Paid}} to make that explicit. In either case, given your seriously problematic past editing here, you should restrict yourself to making edit requests on the talk pages of the relevant articles and not edit the articles directly. Voceditenore (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at University Canada West, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

St Patrick's College, London

Re this request above concerning the current Principal of St Patrick's College, London. This is not the correct place or way to request an edit. Edit requests go on the article talk page, i.e. Talk:St Patrick's College, London, using Template:Request edit. That page has full instructions for using this template. However, I can find no source indicating that Maurits van Rooijen is the current Principal. I am going to temporarily remove the "Principal" parameter from the infobox until a reliable source is provided via an edit request on the talk page. Voceditenore (talk) 10:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]