User talk:Mememax

Welcome!

Hello, Mememax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- allen四names 10:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coverwallet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Coverwallet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 10:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mememax. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mememax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not really understand why I got blocked. I haven't created any further account and not make use of wikipedia in any abusive way. I only use my account from home, work or my mobile device and I don't think there is any evidence of me using multiple accounts with any of my IPs. I would like to request this personal account to be unblocked, please.

Decline reason:

Your deleted contributions and those of other users say otherwise: you're clearly either a meatpuppet or a sockpuppet. The IP data isn't relevant in this case. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is a completely unilateral decision which I doubt reflects the way that wikipedia works. I still don't see any proof nor evidence about anything that justifies any action taken on my personal account. Mememax (talk) 10 November 2017 }}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mememax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I was the first person in creating the CoverWallet entry, that being said I have no implication with any of the users you're mentioning. As you will be able to see from logs,IPs, etc. I have no correlation nor have interacted with any of them. I have been a wikipedia user since 2008 and I keep my account just for rare edits. I always followed wikipedia rules and will continue doing so because I believe in this community. I'm sorry to not be able to provide further evidence but I'd like you to reevaluate this block decision. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I have strong evidence that you have been violating WP:COI and WP:PAID. That alone is enough to leave you blocked, but serves to back up the relationship with the other accounts. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.