User talk:Melissa.Birk

Welcome!

Hello, Tropi.Press, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pheel Balliana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ɯɐɔ 💬 16:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pheel Balliana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pheel Balliana, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ɯɐɔ 💬 16:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Deb (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Melissa.Birk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood my error and I feel that the block is no longer necessary. I will change my name´s account and will write only impartial texts and also make productive contributions about my passions: music and culture. Tropi.Press (talk) 16:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've unblocked you on the condition that you will do no conflict of interest editing. PhilKnight (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want you new username to be? PhilKnight (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was my unblocking allowed? My new username can be Melissa.Birk? Thank you. Tropi.Press 10:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the rename (from User:Tropi.Press), and someone should hopefully review your unblock request soon. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am waiting for the answer about my unblock request. Melissa.Birk 19:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb:- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 23:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, as long as she can assure us she will do no conflict of interest editing.Deb (talk) 13:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: do not worry. I will write only impartial texts (now i got it) and also make productive contributions about my passions: music and culture. @PhilKnight: thanks for your help. I will be waiting for the unblock. Melissa.Birk 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pheel Balliana

Hello, Melissa.Birk,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pheel Balliana should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pheel Balliana .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Domdeparis (talk) 18:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]