User talk:MelissBelle
Welcome
[edit]
|
AfC notification: Draft:Julia Flynn Siler has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Flynn Siler has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Yash! 18:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Recent edit to Julia Flynn Siler
[edit]Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Julia Flynn Siler article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 04:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]Hello, MelissBelle. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Julia Flynn Siler, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
- instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
[edit]Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Julia Flynn Siler has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi MelissBelle!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered by CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Help request
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
MelissBelle (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
I am a new user and I just disclosed that I was paid a small honorarium to help the subject (a friend of a friend-we have never met in person and had no prior relationship). I am wondering how/when the flag will be removed from my article? Not the flag about the links..that one I am still unclear as to how exactly to rectify it, but the other one.
MelissBelle (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- As I said via IRC, the article's tone currently is rather promotional. Thus the "conflict of interest" tag seems relevant; an uninvolved editor should check the content and fix what needs fixing. Until that has happened and someone other than you feels that the tag is no longer necessary, it should stay in place. Huon (talk) 22:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Would love some help!
[edit]I am a new user and would love help with the tone of this article. I would like to have the flags removed here but I am realizing I should not be the one making the edits. My objective here is to inform in the most integral, unbiased way possible, and it seems any future edits to this article should not be made by me. I would be so grateful for any help.
Thank you.
MelissBelle (talk) 22:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Julia Flynn Siler for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Flynn Siler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Flynn Siler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
@Theroadislong
[edit]You're just a gem.
MelissBelle (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]I would like to ask that my article be deleted. MelissBelle (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]Hi MelissBelle, thanks for the thanks, its great that we have been able to 'save' Julia Flynn Siler. I hope you didn't find the experience too traumatic and that you continue to contribute.