User talk:Meghani89

Meghani89, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Meghani89! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kpgjhpjm was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Meghani89/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Meghani89/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kpg jhp jm 17:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Raween Kanishka, from its old location at User:Meghani89/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raween Kanishka (August 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Raween Kanishka concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Raween Kanishka, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Raween Kanishka concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Raween Kanishka, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raween Kanishka

Hello, Meghani89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raween Kanishka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for issues around switching accounts / clean starting in a way which seems to avoid scrutiny (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lakshani85). Plus possible COI/promotional editing at Draft:Raween Kanishka.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked following an investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lakshani85. At that invesigation it was determined that you had violated the sockpuppetry policy using this account. You moved to editing under a new account without disclosing the connection to your previous accounts, so that it looked like you were avoiding scrutiny for your past edits. You may appeal this block using the unblock template and you will need to address if you have a conflict of interest (COI) with regards to Raween Kanishka, if you are being paid to edit and why you have switched accounts without linking them. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meghani89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a duplicate of the account that you have mentioned. This is my only account. I was trying to resubmit my previously edited draft on Raween Kanishka. Please unblock and review my draft. Thank you Meghani89 (talk) 18:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That draft was previously submitted by Itzmeghani. Given the overlap in editing and the almost identical username, this is a pretty straight-forward case. You are clearly evading the block on that account, at least. Yamla (talk) 19:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meghani89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

itzmeghani was my previous account and I created this because I forgot my password. Sorry that I had no idea wikipedia doesn't allow to create another account. If you could please guide me, any which way that I or any of my collegues can submit a draft of "Raween Kanishka" for approval. Thank you Meghani89 (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

itzmeghani was blocked for sockpuppetry. This means you as a person are blocked, and may not edit with any account, whether you have forgotten the password or not. Creating a new account is block evasion. You will need to address the reasons for your sock puppetry before we can consider unblocking. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 10:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meghani89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only reason I had to create a new account is I forgot my previous account's password. I never parallelly use the 2 accounts. Unfortunately it's my bad that I didn't know about wikipedia rules. It's my fault. I have never used any account for any wrong purpose. I have not created any other wikipedia page using these accounts as well. I have been trying to submit this draft for more than a year now. At this point of time, if this account is getting blocked forever, what I want to know is if there is any possibility anyone else can submit a draft for the same name "Raween Kanishka"? I won't be involving in that. Thank you Meghani89 (talk) 11:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. 331dot (talk) 19:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to create new accounts. It's simply not relevant that you forgot your previous account's password. As that account was blocked, you are not permitted to create a new account. Additionally, every single action with this account was a "wrong purpose". Every single action violated WP:EVADE. We aren't interested in the draft you created with this account. It's highly unlikely we'd accept that draft from anyone unconnected to you, either. It's repeatedly been found to be inappropriate for Wikipedia. Please, give it up already. --Yamla (talk) 11:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]