User talk:Meesco

Welcome!

Hello, Meesco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 12:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elgi Compressor (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Frood were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is also very difficult to read. There's only four periods in the entire article. It seems mostly like a timeline of the company, and provides very little context.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elgi Compressor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elgi Compressor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Frood (talk) 03:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meesco! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Frood (talk) 03:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elgi Compressor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Elgi Compressor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elgi Compressor

Hello, Meesco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elgi Compressor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Sam-2727 (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hi Meesco! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Guatemala several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Guatemala, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 22:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Largoplazo

I appreciate your feedback and guidance,

I don't understand the revert of the complete article edited, because the reference to Wikipedia, is only in some relative information, the reference are not on statement.

I corrected the indicated reference, so, Why revert the complete document? Meesco (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the content you added is poorly written, and I can't even tell what much of it means. You have line breaks in strange places. I don't know what "has an growing average of almost 10%" means. You've got partial sentences, sometimes ending with commas, before you start new sentences. For example, you've got one paragraph that reads "Cruise line harbor These harbor are for a stop-off point for cruise liners. Puerto Quetzal Santo Tomas de Castilla". This is not readable. Largoplazo (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]