User talk:Mead1992

November 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Little Mermaid (1989 film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Little Mermaid (1989 film) was changed by Mead1992 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957773 on 2022-11-18T18:47:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake? Mead1992 (talk) 23:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben 10: Omniverse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ben 10: Omniverse, you may be blocked from editing. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Super Mario Bros. Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Monsters, Inc., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Names for actors and characters are what the credits say they are. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Monsters, Inc., you may be blocked from editing. As before and see MOS:FILMCAST Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 20:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dinotopia. fake credit Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Starchaser: The Legend of Orin. fake credits again Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you unblocked me, please? Mead1992 (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #70365

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]