User talk:Mcdonalds

This user left Wikipedia. Mcdonalds has not edited Wikipedia since May 15, 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Re: Undo

I undid your edits because the Hot Digital Songs chart doesn't go in that table. It should be mentioned only in the prose in the chart performance section. You can see other articles for this. My love is love (talk) 09:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on ringtones

Hi again,

I would like to invite you to participate in this discussion on whether ringtones should be considered singles or not.

Your input would be appreciated, especially if we want to reach consensus.--Mαuri^’96 “...over the Borderline” 04:04, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding your best-selling singles table

Given that an editor has recently posted the download-only sales of "Low" (6,372,000) and "Irreplaceable" (3,076,000), I'm now planning to add your table to the real list.

Once this is done, everyone will see how ringtone sales contribute to single sales and the edit war around "Irreplaceable" will hopefully end.--Mαuri^’96 “...over the Borderline” 04:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been busy recently, so feel free to add my table. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 05:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three million song section on the List of best-selling singles in the United States

I would like to formally invite you to participate in the discussion concerning the inclusion of the "Over 3 million copies" section.

Your opinion will be appreciated in an effort to consider both viewpoints and come to an agreement.--Mαuri^’96 “...over the Borderline” 23:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Britney spears sales

Hi, Sales are supported by a source, it is just your opinion that they are inflated. What you are doing is against wikipedia's rueles, next time you will be reported. Thanks--Albes29 (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Avril Lavigne does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 23:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

End of Time

End of Time is a single. Why do you keep removing the song from the Singles table without a reason or consensus? If you believe End of Time is not a single, you need to discuss this first at Talk:End of Time (song) and invite other users from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles into the discussion. 114.77.226.195 (talk) 04:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gangnam Style

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gangnam Style. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 10:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will add it tomorrow and you'll notice you were wrong. And sources usually don't prove anything. Mostly Wikipedia articles are full of fake numbers. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 10:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the source in question, you have to do it when that source is updated. That will usually happen by the end of the week. There is no need to add rush information, especially when no official rankings have been released yet. Widr (talk) 10:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced, again

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of number-one albums of 2012 (U.S.)‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 12:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is beyond funny. Sources don't prove anything on most articles. Wikipedia is full of fake numbers, especially artists' sales figures. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 16:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas

May your Christmas sparkle with moments of love, laughter and goodwill,

May the year ahead be full of contentment and joy,

May the good times and treasures of the present become the golden memories of tomorrow,

Merry Christmas To U & Ur Family.

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl XLVII halftime show

Hurricane Beyonce caused a power failure! --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Halo

Thank you for your edits on the article though it is not compulsory to change the certifications table. Since you have already done that, is there a way to fix RF 193 here? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Always wanted to do it so you're welcome. I don't understand what's wrong with 193 to be honest. I'm trying to discover. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 16:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed! · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 16:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think I will have to remove the box because of the way the references it contains got automatically formatted. It's FA status could be questioned because of that. It has led to over-linking and over-referencing. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC comment?

Hi. Would you be interested in commenting at/reviewing this FAC for Aaliyah (album)? If not, no need to reply back. Dan56 (talk) 03:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate ...

... here. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of albums which have spent the most weeks on the UK Albums Chart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4 (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of number-one albums of 2009 (Ireland) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| 15 January || ''I Am... Sasha Fierce'' || [Beyoncé

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

#Beautiful

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Beautiful (Mariah Carey song), you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and tense

Hey! Thanks for your additions of UK sales to Beyonce articles. However, can I ask that you take a look at your style of prose please? Contractions such as "it's" are not encylopaedic. Also when using "as of" (or "as at"), please use the correct verb tense (ie "has sold" or "had sold", respectively). Again, thanks for your edits, and keep up the good work! Adabow (talk) 22:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of best-selling albums in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4 (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC comment?

Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? The review page hasn't had much activity in a few weeks. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 19:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Empire (Shakira song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

In Spain], "Empire" debuted at number 29 on the [[PROMUSICAE]] chart, while in France, the song managed to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Lana Del Rey discography, you may be blocked from editing. The 7,000,000 sales figure for Born to Die is sourced and has been mentioned by several other reliable publications. Littlecarmen (talk) 18:03, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Shakira discography page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2004 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Now That's What I Call Music! 16. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the '03 Bonnie & Clyde page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors

Hey, please check that a reference is not reused before deleting its name, as you did here ("uk_yearend" is used elsewhere in the article). Thanks. Adabow (talk) 01:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Your recent editing history at Shakira discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:16, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears BOMT and OIDIA: 250,000 in Brazil.

Hi. I put in the certification table, that both Britney's album BOMT and OIDIA, sold each 250k in Brazil because I found an brazilian article from ISTOÉ, that says that. I have another one that says the same thing, it came for brazilian magazine Veja, and you can find it in the acervo digital of the magazine. They are reliable sources, and have articles in the wiki about both of them. Someone inflated the worldwide sales, but I corrected it, as you can see.--88marcus (talk) 23:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Single Ladies and your associated edits

Please consider this as a warning for your blatant bloating of sales here in the article "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on it)". I'm letting this go as a silly mistake, but don't repeat it, you already have problematic edits in your editing history and will be reported. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mcdonalds. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé sales figures

Just a friendly query... I honestly don't care that much about the sales figures in these articles and won't be getting into an edit war over them, I just added what I found – if it's considered unreliable, fair enough. But I'm wondering why you believe the Huffington Post article is not credible, despite it stating that the figures were provided directly to it by Nielsen SoundScan, and why the figures from a women's magazine are. Richard3120 (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not an actual article from the Huffington Post; it's just an article from a contributor of the site. Nielsen SoundScan doesn't track global sales - actually, nobody does! - but though it does track U.S. sales, the U.S. sales figures from the article aren't even correct. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 02:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I only added them because that IP kept altering the sales figures for all Beyonce's album articles, without saying where the source came from... I just found the source and added it, if other editors deem it unreliable then at least they knew where the IP got the figures from and could check it.

You're so right about global sales - I came to these articles because I try and keep an eye on List of best-selling girl groups, which frankly is a bit of a joke because of the constant arguments over worldwide sales figures, which as you rightly say nobody has, so it's a bit of a waste of time having an article about it. Richard3120 (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

French chart

I have previously discussed this issue with a variety of users, including IndianBio and ChrisMartinYoung. The downloads chart is still an "official" chart, as it's published by SNEP; I understand you're probably referring to the megafusion chart that only started several months ago that includes downloads and streams. There is no policy on Wikipedia that states we cannot use a component chart before the "main" chart is available. Also, the download chart is often added because its peak is closer to what lescharts.com, an accepted French chart archive, eventually hosts on its site as a song or an album's peak. To allay your concerns, I have added "download" to the chart name on the article. Ss 112 03:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edit summary on Look What You Made Me Do, yes, other countries don't have the downloads peak there if the main chart is available. That was my point. You also forgot to change the reference title, which still gave the impression the downloads chart was being used. Ss 112 19:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chartmasters.org

With regards to your edit here, is there any particular reason you say this site "isn't allowed here"? I found nothing on the matter at WP:WikiProject Albums/Sources, its talk page archives, or WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. For what it's worth, the link does base its figures from International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and Spotify data. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't base its figures from IFPI since we hardly get anything from the federation. The figures posted are pure sales only so they have nothing to do with Spotify. I think Chartmasters.org is good but I fail to see how it would be allowed on Wikipedia as the website is just a personal blog at the end of the day and they're usually not allowed on Wikipedia (Lord knows it's still more trustworthy than all those 'reliable' sources that Wikipedia allows). I actually reverted ShaneFilaner's edit because he didn't use Chartmasters.org for a few records just because their sales estimates were much lower than what they found elsewhere. Anyway, I don't mind it being used but I'd think Wikipedia wouldn't allow it. But if it's fine, then it should be used for all albums and songs on the Katy Perry article. · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 21:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree its use (or lack thereof) should be consistent, and have definitely seen worse publications than that. While Shane might have been trying to cherry-pick figures to keep higher estimates (which wouldn't surprise me given his past tendency to defer to bigger numbers even if inflation is a concern), that shouldn't be the basis for whether this is viable or not. Might be worth taking to a noticeboard or WikiProject talk page for further input. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout (Britney Spears album)

Hi. Metacritic says "generally positive". If users can't agree with a summary, we should stick with what Metacritic says. I, and other users as far back as 2014, disagree with "mixed". Summarising reviews in this way violates WP:SYNTH as you're summarising without a source explicitly stating your conclusion. Saying "generally positive" is what Metacritic says, and therefore not SYNTH. Please leave it or open a discussion instead of being involved in a slow-motion (or active) edit war when you go back to edit the page every few months. We leave the page as it was (the last stable version) in disagreements, and quite frankly, what other albums state with a score of 61 is irrelevant (and if they are summarising reviews as "mixed", this violates SYNTH as well if no source says "reviews were mixed"), so this should not be seen as a precedent. Thank you. Ss 112 12:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé discography

Per your removal of references on Beyoncé discography, the references supporting the peaks need to stay there, as Billboard's chart history page(s) for Beyoncé do not include songs she is featured on but not the primary artist of. The French ref in the column is also inadequate and does not cover the peak. Ss 112 00:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mcdonalds. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Perfect (Ed Sheeran song)

I'd like to reiterate what I said in my partial revert of you: we go by what the sources say. The Spanish and Swedish sources are crediting that the certification ONLY applies to the version with Beyonce. We can't say that the certifications include sales for the original version if that's not what the source says, even if it appears obvious. The source used on the article for Spain states that it is the Beyoncé version that is certified: [1] (that page is only for the duet). Searching "Ed Sheeran" on sverigetopplistan.se only brings us "Perfect Duet" for the song altogether, and this is what is certified. If you think we should disregard that only the remix is shown as certified, please take it to the talk page per WP:BRD, WP:CONSENSUS. Thank you. Ss112 19:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mcdonalds. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Mcdonalds a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]