User talk:Mccajor

Hello Mccajor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe 16:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your contributions

This morning I checked to see if anyone had finally written an article on Richard Shweder and was pleased to see that you had done so. I share a number of your interests in anthropology, queer studies and Harvard, and I've written a some articles in each of these areas. I had been planning to write an article on Shweder for some time, but never got around to it.

Your idea of "a WikiProject to clean up and expand articles related to socio-cultural anthropology" is a good one, and I might be able to help. Please feel free to check out some of the articles [started]. My own areal interests would be South Asia, above all, but then also be other places I've lived: Turkey, Latin America, Korea and Egypt. The universities I'm most interested in are those in which I've studied: Harvard, the University of Delhi, and the University of Chicago. I you wish to communicate but not our own respective user pages, you may Send an email Interlingua ^{talk email} 12:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Tuzin

Tuzin was a professor of mine, and I was planning on creating his article myself, but I think you've done him more justice than I ever could, so I just wanted to give you kudos! One question though. Since you are an anthropologist and perhaps own some of his books, I don't suppose any of them in the publication information section contain his year of birth? Thanks, Canadian Paul 08:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moribund language

Thank you for your great contributions to the Moribund language page! I noticed, though, that there are no references on the page or in the text there... as you seem knowledgeable on the subject, could you add some references to the page? Thanks! mitcho/芳貴 15:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Mccajor 20:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for theTanya Luhrmann entry!

I've been reading Of Two Minds and found your entry on Tanya Luhrmann. It is very good. Most excellent. Just the information I was looking. Keep up the good work (or, rather, please, please continue contributing to Wikipedia).

Patrick Mhnin0 02:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Availability for Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anthropology/Collaboration_of_the_month

The probable sorry state of 'core anthropology' articles on Wikipedia has been recently identified here

As a self-nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anthropology member, I thought I'd check on your interest and willingness to see anthropology better represented on Wikipedia? Bruceanthro (talk) 14:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mccajor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Stephen O. Murray - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hagop S. Akiskal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lola Romanucci-Ross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mccajor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Naomi Quinn

Hello, Mccajor,

Thanks for creating Naomi Quinn! I edit here too, under the username MurielMary and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for creating this article on Naomi Quinn. Can you add some more references and citations to it? Let me know if you need help, or you can ask for help at the Teahouse (search for it on Wikipedia). Happy editing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MurielMary}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MurielMary (talk) 11:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MurielMary: Thanks. I have added a number of citations and begun to flesh out a description of Naomi Quinn's intellectual legacy. I am curious, as I was looking through the Talk page, that there are categories for [category:Unknown-importance Women scientists articles] and Category:Unknown-importance Women's History articles but there don't seem to be corresponding Categories for Unknown Important Men Scientists or Unknown Importance Scientists articles. Can you enlighten me as to why women scholars get singled out for the extra scrutiny? Mccajor (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes I agree the categorisation by gender on Wikipedia is very odd! There are categories without a gender title e.g. "Biologists" say, and then there is a sub-category "Women biologists" but no sub-category "Men biologists". I think there have been very long and very tense discussions/arguments/fights on WP about this issue and there has never been a clear resolution. I think there are many editors who believe "women biologists" for example should be a subset of "biologists" but in my opinion "biologists" should have subcategories of "men biologists" and "women biologists". I think I'm definitely in the minority on that though! Anyway, because there is no agreement on having categories for men, there is no systematic categorisation for biographies of men on WP. MurielMary (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. It just brings to mind the extra scrutiny of women scholars on Wikipedia, particularly around "notability". Mccajor (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Psychoanalytic institutes and societies in the United States

Some of the content you included in the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jungian Institutes and Societies in North America moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jungian Institutes and Societies in North America, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Psychoanalytic Center of California

Hello, Mccajor,

Thank you for creating Psychoanalytic Center of California.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the Psychoanalytic Center of California.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve James Gooch (psychoanalyst)

Hello, Mccajor,

Thank you for creating James Gooch (psychoanalyst).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article, James Gooch (psychoanalyst), though I recommend finding some more reliable sources if there are any.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jungian Institutes and Societies in North America concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jungian Institutes and Societies in North America, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jungian Institutes and Societies in North America

Hello, Mccajor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jungian Institutes and Societies in North America".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Distinguished Achievement Award, Association for Queer Anthropology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Distinguished Achievement Award, Association for Queer Anthropology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Distinguished Achievement Award, Association for Queer Anthropology

Hello, Mccajor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Distinguished Achievement Award, Association for Queer Anthropology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Distinguished Achievement Award, Association for Queer Anthropology

Hello, Mccajor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Distinguished Achievement Award".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]