User talk:McMalcolm

The Boyhood Sessions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Boyhood Sessions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is an official release. All you have to do is google it and you can see that As are the other items we’ve tried to add for album entries Not sure what else you need. However if it’s too difficult we won’t bother to update or help McMalcolm (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Live at Cropredy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Live at Cropredy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, not understanding why your moving or deleting as trying to create this listing and others for Osibisa albums in the discography ? McMalcolm (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

African Dawn, African Flight

Hello, I received your email about this article. I have made your article redirect to the band's article, as you did not demonstrate the significance of the album as separate from the notability of the band. You need to add reliable sources which establish that the album is a notable music album. I created Draft:African Dawn, African Flight for you - there, you can add sources and improve the article, and then submit it for review. In the alternative, you can add information on the album as the Osibisa page. If you have questions, please respond to me here, or otherwise ask the wider community at somewhere such as the Teahouse. Best ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 19:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lansdowne Tapes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RPM Records. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wendell Richardson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wendell Richardson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 16:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Osibisa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Boyhood Sessions

Hello, McMalcolm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Boyhood Sessions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Live at Cropredy

Hello, McMalcolm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Live at Cropredy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, McMalcolm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Osibisa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It seems like you may have a relationship with members of the band or their representatives. It can be extremely valuable to have their input, but if you have a COI here it would help to carefully read the above policies. Firefangledfeathers 17:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have an external relationship but I do edit and update from a technical and historical point of view. I certainly know what’s being deleted isn’t right, hence hi-lighting it. McMalcolm (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I was a bit misled by "Knowing the band history, members, producers (who have all commented asking wtf is going on with the deletions on additions they themselves have supplied)", but that may have been referring to public comments by the members and producers. Firefangledfeathers 19:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you. After seeing how many recent rollbacks of accurate additions and accuracy changes have been (possibly maliciously) performed by Random Canadian in recent times on items I and others have added to (all fully verifiable on/in issued record and CD albums and various music, distribution and band websites) I think someone needs to look closely at whether there is a questionable motive from/by that specific editor. Every single one of the original edits we contributed to was accurate to our knowledge and fully verifiable. Frankly if there is someone out there running riot with a random delete pen then I’d rather not try to help at present even though I and others want to improve on the accuracy of the information and clearly know the subject matter better than the Random Canadian. There are already queries by others to Random Canadian as to why some of the rollbacks are being applied when things are easily verifiable on artist websites. In my opinion I view their recent actions as petty and malicious, in fact it is hard not to reach this conclusion. I leave it to others to deal with this properly and hopefully address the situation so that the addition of musical knowledge and facts can increase as it all should. In the meantime I won’t bother to add anything else in the fear our time and effort is wasted by the current actions of Random Canadian. If you can direct me where else this information should be placed to help solve this it would be most appreciated.

 McMalcolm (talk) 23:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. I have moved the above report to the new venue given your persistent inability to understand the issue here and your deflection and uncivil comments towards me. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Boyhood Sessions

Hello, McMalcolm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Boyhood Sessions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Live at Cropredy

Hello, McMalcolm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Live at Cropredy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Album additions and relevant information.

Hi Liz, these are valid album entries that should each have their own separate section so relevant album info can be updated. Each of the ones we put in are CD’s that were released and had or have current distribution worldwide. However after there were a spate of deletions with the Osibisa section (for example the same user deleted all of the ‘singles’ information and then kept deleting nearly all new additions (all valid and verifiable I might add). We gave up as afterall, what is the point of adding or updating the pages with correct, valuable, verifiable information such as singles, albums, contributor info such as producers and the like keeps being deleted. We did put forward a formal complaint but the user seems to sneakily (and cleverly I might add) gotten this turned over or ignored. Frankly we gave up even though we know absolutely what they were (and possibly still are) doing is completely wrong. Hence we know that much good information has been deleted or changed (where it is clearly wrong) because of a random updater’s completely unnecessary hissy fit. I’d love to see these pages updated correctly and diligently like I’m sure anyone else who’s interested in this band (and many others) would like as well. However it works need removal of toxic editors before good intentioned people like myself would bother to do this again. More than happy to help where we can if you would like to take this task on. McMalcolm (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Osibisa new album entries

As per previous note regarding another valid Osibisa album.

Hi Liz, these are valid album entries that should each have their own separate section so relevant album info can be updated. Each of the ones we put in are album CD’s that were released and had or have current distribution worldwide. However after there were a spate of deletions within the Osibisa section (for example the same user deleted all of the ‘singles’ information and then kept deleting nearly all new additions (all valid and verifiable I might add). We gave up as afterall, what is the point of adding or updating the pages with correct, valuable, verifiable information such as singles, albums, contributor info such as producers and the like keeps being deleted by some random, uninformed, clearly vindictive ‘editor’ I use that term loosely of course. We did put forward a formal complaint but the user seems to sneakily (and cleverly I might add) gotten this turned over or completely ignored. Frankly we gave up even though we know absolutely what they were (and possibly still are) doing is completely wrong. It was the sort of idiotic deleting/ editing that actually gives Wiki the bad name for total inaccuracy it gets from time to time. Hence we know that much good information has been deleted or changed (where it is clearly wrong) because of a random updater’s completely unnecessary hissy fit. I’d love to see these pages updated correctly and diligently like I’m sure anyone else who’s interested in this band (and many others) would like as well. However it would need removal of toxic editors like the one alluded to previously before good intentioned people like myself would bother to do this again. More than happy to help where we can if you would like to take this task on. McMalcolm (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Best of Osibisa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Best of Osibisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Best of Osibisa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Best of Osibisa. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Best of Osibisa

Hello, McMalcolm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Best of Osibisa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Best of Osibisa

Hello, McMalcolm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Best of Osibisa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]