User talk:McCain's Man

It is very unfortunate that you have left thank you for all of the Help, I here that you will be coming back soon though that shall be good!--General Lafayette (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh your welcome, I needed to take a brake too!! I havent been doing much editing, but i sign in so that I can edit if I decide that I need too. --General Lafayette (talk) 02:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, I hope I make it! Have a Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver ^{The Olive Branch} 22:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ?

No i was not aware that he was, i will go and look for it and see if i can vote. --General Lafayette (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	I seem to have drawn a crowd of support!
	I'm honored to have been elected as a coordinator of the WikiProject Military history and most sincerely thank you for your vote of support. I will endeavor to fulfill the obligations in a manner worthy of your trust. Many thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
	A World War I U-boat draws a crowd after grounding on the Falmouth coast in 1921.

Lady Mary Anne Howard

Proposed deletion of Lady Mary Anne Howard

The article Lady Mary Anne Howard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hi, I've proposed the page you began, Lady Mary Anne Howard, for deletion. This is because another user added some information and a link to his source which makes it sound like the Mary who married Ferris couldn't have been a Howard. Also, the link the article cites for the idea that she was a Howard seems to come from a "legends" section of the genealogy website and refers only to "A tradition claims" as well as several competing claims. If Mary wasn't a Howard (as seems likely) then there doesn't seem to be any other reason for her to have an article on Wikipedia. Please let me know if you've got any questions about this proposed deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Zeborah (talk) 10:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]