User talk:Mburton4000

Hello Mburton4000, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Mburton4000, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 07:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

U.S.- Mexico Maritime Boundary Agreements moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, U.S.- Mexico Maritime Boundary Agreements, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources.(?) It also needs to be formatted properly -- see other articles on similar topics for examples. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mburton4000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Mburton4000, what I see you adding is material that seems to be related to the work of a Mark B. Feldman. If you have a conflict of interest, you need to declare that. On top of that, your edits are not properly formatted, and they are very unclear--and unexplained. Drmies (talk) 23:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got your email, but I think it is more helpful and appropriate for me to answer here. Without going into all the details, let me just say this: a conflict of interest is a separate thing from a financial interest; it is more broad than that. Second, Wikipedia articles should be based on secondary sources, preferably sources that have been properly published and peer-reviewed. Material like this, that will likely never be accepted by Wikipedia editors, including me--it's an interview, so it's the person's own words and they can say whatever they want, and it's not published in a way that includes editorial oversight. The formatting isn't that much of a problem; the very first problem is that at least that one is just not acceptable in the first place--nor is a link to a website and a suggestion to click "search". And in your message you said, about one edit, that the information was "accurate, non-controversial and easily verifiable by any attorney familiar with the case"--but that is not acceptable here, and we're not going to go through the phone book looking for an attorney familiar with the case. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United States–Mexico Maritime Boundary Agreements

Hello, Mburton4000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States–Mexico Maritime Boundary Agreements, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]