User talk:Mbbradford

Welcome!

Hello, Mbbradford, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Esperanza!

Welcome, Mbbradford, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact our administrator general Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

–- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 07:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation for you....

Hello, Mbbradford! As a new user, you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User - it's a program designed to help new users by pairing them up with an experienced Wikipedia editor, who will help new users learn the ins and outs of Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, simply type {{Adoptme}} on your userpage! If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 08:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Betachek_test_strips.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Betachek_test_strips.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Betachek test strips.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Betachek test strips.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 04:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BME Related

Hey, thanks for the messages. I have restored a small portion of the BS BME article and I'm working on how to include more content to make the article comprehensive and on par with other specific BS degree articles. Most of it is still gone because it is very specific to WUSTL, as everything related to the courses, credit requirements and the tracks were only for WUSTL and are hardly representative of all programs. I am also weary of taking a lot of it at face value as a good measure for a program since WUSTL does not have an ABET accredited BS degree in BME or BE. They are most likely pursuing it, but until it's official, I would rather rely on another source to generate a list of basic foundations/requirements for the degree. If you have any input or content, please let me know or just edit the article directly.

I'll also have a look over the artificial pancreas article. Thanks! Cquan 19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DM1 & breastfeeding

No need to be insulted. Please assume good faith and presume that I have the interest of the encyclopedia content in mind. This is not personal, and I have no agenda beyond creating a good article on diabetes. Obviously, "reducing risk" does not equal "removing risk". It is still possible for a breastfed child to develop diabetes, much like I have met healthy non-smokers who have developed lung cancer.

If you have a beef with the content of the article, especially with sourced content that has been there for a long time, please start off by discussing this on the relevant talk page, Talk:Diabetes mellitus. JFW | T@lk 20:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a reasonably thorough PubMed search. I see this line of enquiry started in 1984, and that there have been several negative trials. Please offer your comments on Talk:Diabetes mellitus. Alternatively, perhaps you could ask Alteripse (talk · contribs) to mediate, as he is an expert on this subject. JFW | T@lk 21:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub sorting

Hello Mbbradford,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! --Umalee 04:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amylin

Hi Mbbradford,

I noticed you did some good work on this page. I just discovered it and added a little. Keep up the good work.

Best, Jasu 10:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Annual geothermal solar.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Annual geothermal solar.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5 card majors

Hi there: Since I play five-card majors myself, I know that what you're talking about has many reliable sources in the literature; I just wanted to remind you that those reliable sources will be required (especially for your contention as regards a two-diamond opener, which is not part of SAYC as I understand it). If you need any help finding those sources, I'm at your service; call upon me if you need anything. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, should the article be moved to "Five-card majors" -- with the hyphen? Accounting4Taste:talk 18:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I didn't realize the 2D opener suggestion was a mistake -- I thought it was part of some advanced system of which I wasn't aware, where 2D shows four cards in both majors!!! Now that that's 1D, I get it!! (I was going to go home and start looking into "Bridge Conventions Complete" looking for that one to see what was up with that, it sounded interesting!!) If I can be of any service with anything at all, please feel free to call upon me at your convenience -- but it seems as though you're doing fine on your own, the article is concise and lucid. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge Base Basic

Hi, my understanding of NT rebids is that after a 1 of a suit opening, a simple rebid shows 13-14 HCP and a jump rebid shows 18-19 HCP. However, a 'simple rebid' is not always 1NT because the simple rebid could also be 2NT, for example 1♥-2♣-2NT. Similarly, a 'jump rebid' is not always 2NT (for example 1♥-2♣-3NT). That is part of the reason why a 2-over-1 response promises more strength than a 1-over-1. Unfortunately, the Learn to Play Bridge program (which is what Bridge Base Basic system is based on) doesn't cover 2/1 auctions much, so it would be nice to have a different source to confirm this. Thanks, Insanephantom 08:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Basal_control.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Basal_control.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 01:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even though they are out of business, someone still has the rights to their software (probably through bankruptcy court), so it could only be used under a non-free license claim from Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/Non-free_content#Screenshots with a rationale from Wikipedia:FURG as to why it can be used. MBisanz ^talk 00:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bolus control.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bolus control.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you an email :-)

Wikipedia guidelines says it is a good idea to give a note about it on the recipients User-talk-page, so here it is :-)
--Seren-dipper (talk) 06:06, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Wikipedia Ambassadors

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian associated with Boston University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at schools in Boston and Cambridge, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Boston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.

If you're an experienced and active Wikipedian, you might be interested alternatively in becoming an Online Ambassador. The role of Online Ambassadors is to serve as mentors for students; it doesn't require any in-person outreach. Take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridgebase.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bridgebase.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 23:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Artificial Pancreas.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bio-artificial pancreas with Islet Sheet technology.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feedback loop.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Feedback loop.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Inrush currents table 1.jpg

The file File:Inrush currents table 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OKbridge 2/1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OKbridge 2/1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OKbridge 2/1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tdslk (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridgebase.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridgebase.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Site rotations.jpg

The file File:Site rotations.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused with no apparent encyclopedic use, hand-drawn and can easily be replaced by a better quality image

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 08:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]