User talk:MaximusWikipedian

AfC notification: Draft:Crown Office has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Crown Office. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crown Office (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

How does something have 3.5 employees?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crown Office and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crown Office, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 17:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaximusWikipedian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah ^💬 17:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ceri King for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceri King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceri King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bolles. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Barbadian National Heroes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you wanted to move the page to Order of National Heroes, you should do that with a WP:Pagemove, rather than copying and pasting to a new title. Ost (talk) 21:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Order of National Heroes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Order of National Heroes, is not suitable as written to remain published, as it is largely duplicating the information on Barbadian National Heroes. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. In this case, you also may consider using a WP:Pagemove or Requested Move to move Barbadian National Heroes to the new title. This may warrant discussion on Talk:Barbadian National Heroes. Ost (talk) 21:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ceri King

I've restored the article for review at User:MaximusWikipedian/Ceri King. Apologies for the delay. decltype (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

added a link pointing to Privy Council Office

Privy Council Office (United Kingdom)

added a link pointing to Privy Council Office

Privy Council of the United Kingdom

added a link pointing to Privy Council Office

Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom

added a link pointing to Privy Council Office

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the input on my contributions, though I believe a consensus was reached on both Audrey Callaghan and Serena Armstrong-Jones, Countess of Snowdon. Their titles are known as per Debbret's, though as they are not very 'famous' persons, their titles and styles are not often mentioned (for example, Lady Serena's title is only noted in the Gazette when Her Majesty granted permission for the marriage to Viscount Linley). I believe the information should still as you've put it with a citation needed notice. MaximusWikipedian (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to David Cholmondeley, 7th Marquess of Cholmondeley. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 14:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Paulsen

Hello. When you disagree with a change being made in Wikipedia, even if it is a change to your own contribution, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Reverting the changes can result in an edit war (WP:WAR). Please respect the 3 edit rule (WP:3RR). AtomsRavelAz talk 18:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Beatrice's unnamed daughter

The article Princess Beatrice's unnamed daughter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August Brooksbank

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 22:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Princess Beatrice's daughter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Beatrice's daughter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Beatrice's daughter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DrKay (talk) 20:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Forms of address in Chile

The article Forms of address in Chile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBchrch talk 17:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Don't misrepresent sources. There's nothing in the source given to support the contention in the article. DrKay (talk) 08:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move of Letters Patent (United Kingdom) to Letters patent (United Kingdom)

I have proposed moving the page Letters Patent (United Kingdom) to Letters patent (United Kingdom), and have opened a discussion at Talk:Letters Patent (United Kingdom)#Requested move 20 May 2022 where comments in support or opposition may be made. As you have previously commented on the naming of the page, I invite your input.

Mauls (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WhatDoTheyKnow

Template:WhatDoTheyKnow has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]