User talk:Max rspct/archive9

~~You seem another one of those that needs to get a life! You are always on the net. Get a life man and get a grip on the miserable life you seem to lead. RAFIQUE~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.186.162.14 (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J ? or is that your rent boy? I am doing quite well.. and have a clean conscience. Yes .. maybe i'm fairly prolific and need intimidating by a schoolboy like you. :) --maxrspct ping me 20:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is Giovanni Di Stefano son aged 27. ~~What a prick you are. There are none so blind as those who cannot see and you certainly can see no further than your own backside. Get a life.~~ I agree with Mr Rafique. You are not even a millionth of my father and spend your time gossiping and spreading useless rumour without foundation like a fishmonger wife from the fens but then you are from there. Stick with your bogs because that is where your thoughts on decent people belong. Get a life if you can find one. MSSD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.57.155.90 (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OOh your daddy is best? well run to him then! the truth is out!! --maxrspct ping me 14:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You like to attack other people don't you defaming them but then when you get a piece of your own medicine you cant take it. Be a man if you actually know what that is. If not take a lesson from my father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.57.155.90 (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its about documented events.. not childish cussing. Go away fool. --maxrspct ping me 15:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Male human buttocks.jpg

WikiProject Newsletter n°1

Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:

In an effort to determine the active members from the inactive, all members are asked to simply sign on my special userpage.
I have slightly rearranged and updated the Project page, putting all the featured lists in collapsible tables. This unclutteres the page and you only have to see them if you want to. Give your feelings at the talk page.
I have made a Wikipedia advert for our project, Image:Qxz-ad108.gif, what do you think? Personally I feel the words need improving ...
There are still map problems at Template:French commune - any help at resolving them would be greatly appreciated.
What about starting a monthly drive? We currently have no Featured Portals (except for the Basque Portal which really isn't French any way), so how about improving Portal:France??? I don't know what's exactly wrong but the criteria can be seen at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria.

It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, Chris DHDR (17:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Barlinnie-rooftops.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Barlinnie-rooftops.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism.net

Just so you know, has nothing to do with aryan anarchism. Where did you get that from? Zazaban 19:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a page/essay on it.. if u search u will find it all over the forum. --maxrspct ping me 19:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter December 2007

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Decemberr 2007
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 22:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, image deletion

Hey Max, what's up. Listen, I messed up, I deleted Image:Chico Mendes.jpg (which you uploaded in '06), without first giving you a week's notice, which I was supposed to. The reason for deletion was that it was replaceable fair use, an image of someone that there's a free image for (hence the blue link above, the free image exists on commons). So it's up to you: If you'd rather have the week, I can undelete it, but it's extremely likely that it'll just get deleted again after the week, so I sort of hate to undelete it just to have it get deleted again. But like I say, it's up to you. Sorry for the error, I'm really quite embarrassed about it. Peace, delldot talk 11:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°2

It's been one high aiming month! The French WikiProject and related pages have been aiming high for Christmas - and have received an equal number of presents in return!

The French Portal is now a Featured Portal!!! It passed its Candidacy with 100%. Special thanks go to NYArtsnWords and all those that have made this Portal work.
The Newsletter has made it to a second issue. You can find its page at WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter and its archives at WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter/Archives.
A new page has been setup (WikiProject France/Links) to provide an index of the Projects/Portals pages (as well as helping newbees). When creating any pages in the Project/Portal namespace, please add them to the index page. This page also give WP:FRANCE members a handy watchlist.
As like last time, members are asked to renew their memberships at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Members.
I will be on holiday when the next issue is meant to come out so could some generous person(s) please do the next issue at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter.

Well, that's this issue. Au revoir et à bientôt till the next time, Chris DHDR (18:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mistachuck.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mistachuck.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mmppa-logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Mmppa-logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mokum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mokum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008
--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you picked up on Verklempts ....

...deletion of Agents of Repression. I guess I fell to sleep at the wheel or something. Thanks for that.: Albion moonlight (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content

Please don't remove reliably sourced relevant material from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Anarchism. Thanks, скоморохъ 16:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not understand the comment you left on my talkpage until I checked the history, as the above is the only comment I have added to this account's user talk page. Please be very clear on this point: are you responsible for the two edits to Wikipedia from IP address 86.22.72.84? скоморохъ 18:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left this warning on [User_talk:86.22.72.84 this IP talkpage] after the IP vandalized User:Operation Spooner's userpage calling them an "ASSHEAD", a clear violation of Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Repeated vandalism and personal attacks may result in a block by administrators (I am not one). Are you responsible for the vandalism? If not, then your comment on my page is extremely confused. If so, you certainly deserved the warning. скоморохъ 18:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your comment on my takpage out of respect for your wishes. I won't post anything else on this matter here. Regards, скоморохъ 23:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert on left anarchism

Yo, I proposed stubbing the left anarchism page - because it was totally uncited apart from Heider's book - on the talkpage on February 5th and asked for editors thoughts on the matter. No-one responded since so I went ahead with it. Would you mind discussing your thoughts on what constructive changes we should make to the article on the talkpage? I have absolutely no desire to edit-war. Regards, скоморохъ 02:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Left anarchism

Hey there Max, is there any way you'd be willing to take this to the article's talk pages instead of wholesale reverting editor's legitimate actions (that is, removal of material that is uncited, and has been tagged as OR for some time}? Hope you're well, Murderbike (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I didn't notice Skomorokh's comment, sorry for the redundancy. Murderbike (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duh! maxrspct ping me 15:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions on left anarchism are quickly becoming disruptive. You baselessly accuse multiple editors of sockpuppetry, slap an AFD tag on the article, don't bother to list it correctly or even make a comment on the AfD I submitted for you in good faith, then come along and blank half the article making it incomprehensible to readers; I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but this behaviour is hard to interpret as anything other than trolling. скоморохъ 16:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blank AfD templates

You've been told that putting a blank AfD template on an article doesn't work. Nothing happens, except that you create work for others cleaning up after you. Your response: to put yet another blank AfD template on the article on the article.

All you have to do, if you won't complete the d*mn process because "you have a life", is tell someone, somewhere (like the talk page) what your reasons are and someone clearing the orphan AfD backlog will do it for you. It really couldn't be simpler.

So, a warning: if you disrupt Wikipedia again by putting an AfD template on an article and giving no decent reasons why the community should discuss deleting that article, you will be blocked from editing to prevent you from doing it again. ➔ REDVEЯS knows how Joan of Arc felt 15:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Max, I've done the paperwork for you, comments here. скоморохъ 15:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neanderthal extinction hypotheses

Hiya, You reverted my edit on the anthropogenically caused extinction hypothesis that although inadequately footnoted was adequately referenced. The article as a whole is highly speculative and needs a very good edit as there is much more highly speculative and entirely un referenced stuff below my addition (that I too would would like to edit out). I do not wish to offend, but, rather than possibly trolling and removing what I considered a quality new addition to the article consider doing some real work there instead as it needs it. (N.B. my user name when logged in is "Mattjs" but I rarely log in and maintain my own pages any more.) Looking forward to your response - or I will be back to reinsert a properly footnoted and less wordy version - here below or probably on my user (IP address pages). As you appear to be an intelligent and avid reader may I recommend the two popular works I referenced in my addition before you revert again, Regards 122.148.173.37 (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions/responses about Your Thoughts on Wikipedia

I had occasion to read over your user page, and some of the things you've written inspire a few questions, perhaps a few friendly debate openers:

"* Wikipedia needs a sovereign, legislative 'general council' composed of ALL editors (of more than 4 months standing?) rather than a elite steering committee or 'Arbcom'. The council would be a decision-making body and a deliberative assembly. It would be a conduit for important working groups temporary and permanent, would be able to change Wikipedia's policies when necessary and also be a place for appeals or petitions (more in the general sense of the word)."

Have you considered the idea that, given the vast number of Wikipedia users, this would result in a ramped-up version of the problem typical of large committees: nothing ever really gets done, and what gets done gets done slowly because discussion takes forever and goes back-and-forth-and-back-and-foth and everyone feels the need to get their two cents in even if what they have to say is irrelevant, incorrect, or already been stated? That's the beauty of having a very small committee, or one head person in charge...things get done, and they get done efficiently and quickly.

I disagree and i think you you have missed an essential part - that "It would be a conduit for important working groups temporary and permanent" - which basically means the council would not be some kind of monolithic, centralized talking shop. Direct democracy and deliberation works and I personally have working experience of them that leaves me very positive. maxrspct ping me 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"* Jimbo Wales needs to give up all excess ownership and control."

Why?

Reply - because he has more control than anyone - unneccessary, is unfair and largely unaccountable. maxrspct ping me 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"* Wikipedia should be recognized for being the democratic, international organization that it is or needs to be."

Have you forgotten that this is an encyclopedia? Not a nation?

I am fully aware that it is not a nation. You should not conflate democracy with the nation-state. maxrspct ping me 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 23:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you got blocked.. you disgusting rascist. --maxrspct ping me 12:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding your edit to Anarchism in the United States.

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Anarchism in the United States. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The language used in your edit summary is totally unacceptable.---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 15:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A note...

If you are going to accuse me of being a sockpuppet, you mental defective, you had better damn well have some evidence. I am sick and tired of dealing with your attitude, your lack of good faith, and your baseless accusations. Shape up or get the hell lost. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 22:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You shape up! Stop reverting back to astoundingly/obvious version. I ain't fooled by anyone. maxrspct ping me 12:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]