User talk:Max.vado56789

hello, I can see that you just edited michael jackson wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simshady1236 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC) bruh[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Max.vado56789, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day (film), have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! A User (contribs) 04:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to The High Fructose Adventures of Annoying Orange, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The High Fructose Adventures of Annoying Orange, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louis Corbett

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Louis Corbett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 07:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 02:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

President of the United States

Hello. Donald Trump will not assume the title of President of the United States of America until January 20, 2017 shortly after noon. This means that Barack Obama is still currently the incumbent President of the United States. Please revert your edits and use the talk page to see what you should and shouldn't change! Thank you! —Surgeon2B Surgeon2b (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm AJFU. Your recent edit to the page Toy Story 4 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AJFU 10:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Markiplier page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Shearonink. Your recent edit to the page Debbie Reynolds appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ATS. Your recent edit to the page Carrie Fisher appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —ATS 🖖 talk 01:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie

Please see {{infobox film}}, where it says to use {{plainlist}} to separate multiple entries in the infobox. Plainlist itself uses asterisks to separate entries. It's not a big deal, but it's how we handle the formatting in film articles. I'm not sure why you keep stripping out the proper formatting in The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie. It would be good if you explained yourself on the article's talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Carrie Fisher, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —ATS 🖖 talk 01:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Abigail Ik. (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Robin Williams, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Edge of Winter (film). - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robin Williams. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Robin Williams. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is your third block for disruptive editing. If there is a need for a fourth you will almost certainly be blocked indefinitely. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]