User talk:Mawlid in UAE

September 2023

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fez (hat), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mawlid in UAE! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Fez (hat) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your warm welcome and advice, I really appreciate it. It's always great to have the guidance of a much experienced person. Mawlid in UAE (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bühler railway station (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

English Wikipdia has stricter notability criteria regarding train stations (see WP:NBUILD); you need to cite sources that discuss this station in more detail. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bühler railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salma Okonkwo (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Editor, I would like to accept this draft but I am concerned about the two images used. You state they are Own work and released under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. This suggests you personally took these photographs with a camera? I find that hard to believe. Please read WP:IMAGEPOL which explains how images can be used on Wikipedia. If you did not personally take these photos, as I suspect, please delete them and re-submit this draft. Let me know on my User Talk Page if you have any questions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salma Okonkwo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mawlid in UAE! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nobel X300 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isuzu.tf. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mawlid in UAE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have asked for an unblock today via the talk page and have also sent an e-mail with a request for an unblock. I have been blocked since today. Maybe someone wants to consider my request and give me a reply?

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the concerns that lead to your block. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to write an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.