User talk:Maverickindian

Welcome!

Hello, Maverickindian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Madanapalle has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Vin09 (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maverickindian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Maverickindian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slate - The School (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. The lede sentence has an external link. That is not permitted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slate - The School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Slate - The School

Hello, Maverickindian. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Slate - The School".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madanapalle

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Madanapalle. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 07:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Sandeepmudalkar.jpeg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sandeepmudalkar.jpeg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yadlapati Venkatarao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1989 general election (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked this account as a sockpuppet of User:Sakthi swaroop and for likely undeclared paid editing. Some of the evidence is not on-wiki, but Maverickindian uploaded commons:File:Confirmtktlogo.png; the OTRS ticket mentioned on the file page is VRTS ticket # 2019020110003358 and is worth a look for any administrator considering to unblock this account. If necessary I will provide additional information or comments via email. Huon (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

@1997KB, Waggie, and Scottyoak: Respected seniors, As insisted by @1997kb and @huon sir in Wikipedia chat, I have been blocked by Wikipedia. I do respect and follow Wikipedia as always I do. Coming to the allegations on me. 1. Sockpuppet of sakthiswaroop. Explanation: I am myself Swaroop and I have used the same user name in Wikipedia chat as well. I always used my original name but with the advice of @vin09 few years back and other seniors i have changed my username. And i do accept 4 years back when i was in wikipeda i was a beginner and Amateur where we used to edit articles along with my roommate @ramsinghdeena. To which wiki blamed us to be sock puppets after that i moved to bangalore. But was more fascinated about again contributing to wikipedia. as per suggestion of @vin09 i have changed my username.But i never touched or edited any articles which i wrote with username:sakthiswaroop. which you can crosscheck.

2. Regarding confirmtkt logo:

Once i started writing articles with my current username.This time i was very careful, i have choosen topics very carefully. tried to learn more about wikipedia always contacted seniors like @1997KB,@scotyyoak,@waggie in wikipedia chat for every doubt. As wiki guidelines are bulk i was more worried and so always felt it would be great to take guidance of seniors. If there was any mistake that would be due to ignorance or miscommunication as i am bit poor in english language.

@1997KB sir, i would be of great help.. if you give your inputs here as i feel youre always my mentor.

Apart from that i am ready to face the investigation with honest and truth. You can always check my edits and i would be grateful if i can again contribute to wikipedia.. --Maverickindian (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Maverickindian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24063 was submitted on Feb 25, 2019 04:58:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sandeep Mudalkar

Hello, Maverickindian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandeep Mudalkar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slate the school for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Slate the school is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slate the school until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Peter Ormond 💬 10:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kotii Reddy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kotii Reddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotii Reddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aronitz (talk) 12:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]